Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Request for Discussion of Ft. Ward Park at Parks, Recreation & Open Space Committee Meeting from Judy Noritake. September 12, 2008.

From: "Judy Noritake"
To: "glenn eugster"
Cc: "Margaret McCormack" , "John and Elizabeth Kling and Sullivan" , "Allen & Nancy Jennings" , "Tom and Jeanne fulton-oleary" , "Dennis and Lynn Carroll"

Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:25:10 AM
Subject: RE: Request for Discussion of Ft. Ward Park at Parks & Open Space Committee Meeting

Dear Glenn and Neighbors:

Thanks for the note and attached paper. Please know that after you contacted me about these issues earlier in the year I spoke with Kirk Kincannon at length several times about the problems and possible solutions at Ft. Ward park. I also asked him to address it at our first Park and Recreation Commission meeting of the 08-09 year which was held this past Wednesday following a hearing on the renovation of the Patrick Henry Recreation Center.
At the meeting Kirk and Roger Blakeley gave the Commission copies of the “cost center” plan for the park and shared with the Commission that a draft facilities use plan will be coming to us at our next meeting. We anticipate that together these documents will begin to address the problems (and opportunities) at Ft. Ward Park which you have been raising. We understand that some significant steps have already been taken to address the management issues at the park and that more will follow. Kirk and Roger were asked about their plan to take these documents to the community located near the park, and certainly your home owner’s association. Roger said that you already have the first document and will be getting the second when it is prepared. They indicated they will reaching out more broadly to the surrounding community with this information as well. I will also ask them to share these with Vice Mayor Pepper.
At the meeting the Commission’s discussion moved beyond the specifics of Ft. Ward to a discussion and acknowledgement that what is occurring at Ft. Ward is not entirely unique, though the recent infraction of the permit (excessive numbers of people at an event) was completely over the top. The truth of the matter is that our larger parks are being used more intensely by more people. That is not entirely a bad thing. 

People should be out using public parks. The Commission has spoken before about the need for the City to look at the larger parks in our City and plan to appropriately accommodate the more intense use that is coming. We to plan to accommodate the use in an appropriate manner, limit it to what the park should bear, to spread the use to other parks in the City (where should we be putting in more picnic pavilions – Chinquapin?) and to identify any new tools that will be required to accomplish that mission. On this last point we discussed a rather hefty increase in a deposit fee to have greater assurance that the terms of permits are followed.
One of the things that you and I have discussed is that the time may have come for a corps of roving “rangers” charged with monitoring and enforcement at these more heavily programmed and used parks. While we will not be able to have full time rangers at each of these areas, a small corps of rangers could make a pretty big dent in the problems these parks experience. While we raised it last year, the Commission will be bringing this up again as a part of the budget process in the coming months. In all fairness, we are all fully aware that it is a difficult economic climate right now to be asking for these additional resources.
In addition, during the previous budget cycle the Commission identified unmet needs in the area of Parks and Recreation that do not appear in the budget out-years. One of those needs we identified at that time was a series of master plans for the larger parks in the city, those that like Ft. Ward that are getting increased visitation and use. We placed the need to do that behind some other pressing priorities (like remodeling Patrick Henry Rec Center). We have asked staff to assemble a list of those parks that would need that planning along with the order in which they most logically need to be addressed. The Commission also understands that the department currently does not have the resources to undertake any of those master planning efforts. The planning staff in the department is far over-extended currently. As you may be aware, the director of the planning division, Aimee Vosper, was recently hired away by the Northern Virginia Regional Planning Commission, further complicating the matter.
In closing I want to say that the Commission has taken this issue seriously, we have discussed it and will continue to ask for updates to monitor progress, including the facilities plan that we expect to see at the October meeting. Please stay in touch with me about issues as they arise and steps your neighborhood is taking. While we may not be able to accomplish everything needed in the immediate future (rangers, or full time park staff, master planning, etc) because of budget and staff constraints, there is much that we can do. I will let the Commission and Kirk know that I received this communication from you. I will ask Kirk to make it a part of his monthly report to the Commission, and I will send a note to Vice Mayor Pepper that we have and will continue to address the issues at Ft. Ward Park.
Thanks Glenn.
Judy Noritake

From: glenn_eugster@comcast.net [mailto:glenn_eugster@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:02 PM
To: Judy Noritake
Cc: Margaret McCormack; John and Elizabeth Kling and Sullivan; Allen & Nancy Jennings; Tom and Jeanne fulton-oleary; Dennis and Lynn Carroll
Subject: Request for Discussion of Ft. Ward Park at Parks & Open Space Committee Meeting

Dear Judy,
I hope this note finds you well.
Today a group of us from Marlboro Estates met with Vice Mayor Pepper to discuss concerns we have regarding the use and management of Ft. Ward Park. Ms. Pepper was most interested in the issues and problems we identified. She suggested I send you a copy of the attached briefing paper and ask you to consider addiing this topic to the agenda of the next Parks & Open Space Committee Meeting. Attached is the briefing paper.
Please let me know if you want to discuss this with us.
Thanks Judy!
Sincerely,
Glenn Eugster

Noise in Fort Ward Park. September 20, 2008

From: "glenn eugster"
To: "rose boyd" , "rose boyd"
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:39:16 AM
Subject: FOIA Request for Ft. Ward Park Permit Information

 
Dear Ms. Boyd,
 
I would like to request information under the City’s Freedom of 
Information Act request policy.  I have tried to get this information 
from City officials but have not received a response. 
On Sunday August 31, from 5 P.M through 9:30 P.M. Braddock Court, Victoria Lane, Louis Place, Lynn House, and Saint Stephens/Saint Agnes School 
were inundated with parked cars from the overflow group activity in Ft. 
Ward Park. The overflow crowd, estimated to be nearly 1,000 people
caused traffic congestion, safety concerns, and excessive trash (esp. 
liquor bottles) in and around the Park and surrounding streets.
Please provide me with a written, or e-mail, copy of the Fort Ward Park 
which were issued by the City for the group, or groups, that held 
the August 31, 2008 event or permit, or permits, 

activity that included amplified music in the band shell area? 
Please also provide me with information describing the City Police Department’s service arrangement with the group, or groups, involved in the park event that day.   
Should you have any questions or need additional information please 
contact me by e-mail at:
glenn_eugster@comcast.net, or by telephone at 703-489-4207.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Glenn Eugster
4022 Ellicott Street
Alexandria, VA 22304-1012 

Preservation Virginia's 2009 List of Endangered Historic Places. April 23, 2009

From: "Robert Nieweg"
To: "glenn eugster" , atwashin@aol.com, awashington@washingtontimes.com, fulton-oleary@verizon.net
Cc: "Maureen Redington"
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:35:40 PM
Subject: RE: Fort Ward Park


Dear Glenn, Tom, and Adrienne:

I was surprised and disappointed on April 22nd to learn that you have decided not to nominate historic Fort Ward to Preservation Virginia's 2009 list of endangered historic places in Virginia.  I thought we had set our way forward on April 9th, during our meeting at Fort Ward with the Civil War Preservation Trust, and that the nomination would be drafted by Adrienne and signed by her and other descendents of post-war Fort Ward residents. 

Preservation Virginia's endangered places program is a ready and reliable way to elevate a local matter, like the City's proposal for Fort Ward, to become a statewide issue, and thereby increase much-needed public awareness, public support, and political pressure.  (See the application at http://www.preservationvirginia.org/calendar/endangered_sites_2009.php.)  Preservation Virginia, which was established in 1889, is a stable and respected organization -- and a good ally

Listing on the nonprofit Preservation Virginia's endangered list, which is a public relations tool, would not jeopardize Fort Ward's listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as the leader of the Friends of Fort Ward mistakenly believes.  (See attached for federal regulations regarding removal of properties from the National Register.)  On the other hand, if implemented, the City's proposed physical and operational changes to Fort Ward could jeopardize the fort's listing on the National Register if Fort Ward were to "cease to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register because the qualities which caused it to be originally listed have been lost or destroyed[.]"  36 CFR 60.15(a)(1). 

As I understand it, you and your allies have two important goals:  You seek to stop the City's new initiative to transform the Park into a high-traffic picnic ground, a change which would adversely impact the historic site and its neighbors.  You also seek to reverse 50 years of the City's mistreatment and neglect of highly sensitive historic and cultural resources within the Park which are associated with the local African-American community that was well-established at Fort Ward after the Civil War.  

To accomplish your goals, I recommend that you and your allies now use the imminent threat of the adverse physical and operational changes by the City to the Park and Fort in order to raise awareness and galvanize support for the more complex and nuanced effort -- which the City and the Friends of Fort Ward must be persuaded to embrace -- to remedy the City's long-standing failure to preserve and interpret the full story of this historic place.  If the imminent threat should pass before you secure a remedy for the City's entrenched policy toward African-American heritage at Fort Ward, an opportunity will have been missed.

Bill Schreiner, on behalf of the Friends of Fort Ward, wrote to you, Glenn, that Fort Ward is viewed as the "best preserved of all the Fort Circle defenses of Washington and the only one that is actively interpreted through a museum."  With all respect to Mr. Schreiner and the Friends, it seems to me that Fort Ward is not a model of success when the City now plans to convert the Park and Fort into a corporate special event site and given that the City has never preserved and interpreted the fort’s full heritage. 

There’s plenty of scholarship to establish the national importance of the Contraband and Freedmen's history the City of Alexandria has forgotten at Fort Ward: 

“Beginning in 1861, and continuing throughout the war, whenever the proximity of Union troops made successful escape likely, slaves abandoned their plantations by the hundreds, even the thousands.  The process of successful slave escapes began in Virginia, in Union-held territory across the Potomac from Washington and around FortMonroe at the tip of the Virginia Peninsula in Hampton Roads. … The slaves, by running away in massive numbers, were freeing themselves.”  -- Prof. Robert F. Engs,University of Pennsylvania

“From the first guns at Fort Sumter, the strongest advocates of emancipation were the slaves themselves.  Lacking political standing or public voice, forbidden access to the weapons of war, slaves nevertheless tossed aside the grand pronouncements of Lincoln and other Union leaders that the sectional conflict was only a war for national unity. Instead, they moved directly to put their own freedom – and that of their posterity – atop the national agenda.  Steadily, as opportunities arose, slaves risked all for freedom. By abandoning their owners, coming uninvited into Union lines, and offering their assistance as laborers, pioneers, guides, and spies, slaves forced federal soldiers at the lowest level to recognize their importance to the Union’s success.  That understanding quickly travelled up the chain of command.  In time, it became evident even to the most obtuse federal commanders that every slave who crossed into Union lines was a double gain: one subtracted from the Confederacy and one added to the Union.  The slaves’ resolute determination to secure their liberty converted many white Americans to the view that the security of the Union depended upon the destruction of slavery.  Eventually, this belief tipped the balance in favor of freedom, even among those who had little interest in the question of slavery and no love for black people. … No one was more responsible for smashing the shackles of slavery than the slaves themselves.” -- Prof. Ira Berlin, University of Maryland

I encourage you to reconsider your decision regarding the Preservation Virginia endangered list.  The deadline is April 24th at 5 pm. 

Thanks in advance for considering my views on this matter. 

Best regards,

-- Rob 

Rob Nieweg
Director and Regional Attorney
Southern Field Office
National Trust for Historic Preservation
1785 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
WashingtonD.C. 20036
202-588-6223 (fax)
202-588-6107 (phone)


From: glenn_eugster@comcast.net [mailto:glenn_eugster@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:58 PM
To: Robert Nieweg
Subject: Fort Ward Park
Dear Rob,

I promised to get back to you to follow-up on our conversation earlier this month.  We met this Saturday to discuss the application for Threatened Landmark status for Fort Ward Park and once again I met resistance from the people that I need to keep our effort alive.  The leader of the Friends of Fort Ward Park feels that it would be harmful for us to pursue this designation at this time given some of the movement we are seeing in the City now.  He also feels that we could jeopardize the park listing on the National Register of Historic Places.  He is willing to reconsider this position in Feb. 2010 if the City doesn't solve some of these problems.  Unfortunately a number of other key leaders echoed his feelings.  Their support is crucial to anything we do and we must be unified in our decisions to succeed.

Recently we have seen the following take place in the City.

1.  Kirk Kincannon the Recreation Dept. chief has left to work in CO.  His deputy Roger Blakeley has been significant restrained due to some racist remarks he made in writing about the graves.  Kirk is being replaced, temporarily by Rich Baier who is more wordly in the ways of working with the public.  We are arranging a walk and talk tour with Rich as soon as next week.

2.  The City has reorganized their management of Departments and they have placed the park portion of the Recreation Dept., along with transportation & Environment, Planning and Zonning, and the Office of Historic Alexandria, under the direction of the Deputy City Manager Mark Jinks.  Tom Fulton and I met with Mr. Jinks and he was positive about the work that needs to be done.  Mr. Jinks assured us that the entire maintenance yard would be emptied as soon as possible.  He believes that Rich Baier will give these problems priority attention.

3.  A number of people made another request to the Mayor and City Council to add money in the 2010 budget, which starts in July 2009, for Ft. Ward Park.  We will know on Saturday what, if anything, they have done.

4.  Congressman Moran has proposed $200,000 in federal funds for Ft. Ward Park as an earmark for 2010.

5.  Several local papers have written about the graves and Lance Mallamo has been interviewed by reporters.  The attention has been good so far.

When we met we sketched out the following draft action plan for the community effort.  We would still like to work with you but the timing isn't right for the application we discussed.  Please let me know if you might be able to participate in the ceremony we are organizing on Clara Adams birthday on June 2, 2009.  Clara is the lady that is buried, with her husband, in the middle of the maintenance yard with the prominent tombstone.

Thanks again for your interest, expertise and assistance.

Sincerely,

Glenn

Glenn Eugster
DRAFT Tasks of Importance (Not in priority order)

1. Keep the pressure on the City to solve Fort Ward Park problems. If we don’t have progress by February 2010 we will apply to the National Trust for Historic Preservation for Threatened Landmarks Status.

2. The Friends of Fort Ward park will send a letter to the City expressing concern about the City’s management of the park. The letter will identify measures of progress that need to be accomplished.(Bill Schreiner)

a. Identify measures of progress to include in the Friends of Fort Ward Park letter to the City.(All send ideas to Bill)

3. Meet with Rich Baier of the City Recreation, Parks & Cultural Activities Department. Meeting will include a walking tour of the park.(Glenn Eugster to initiate request)

4. Develop a Memorandum of Agreement between the Museum, Recreation, Parks & Cultural Activities Department and the Arboretum about the management and maintenance of Fort Ward Park. (???)

5. Develop a new mission statement for Fort Ward Park. (Susan Cumbey)

6. Respond to the April 14, 2009 reports to the City Council from Kincannon, Mallamo and Noritake. (All)

7. Hold a local coffee with the Fort Ward Park neighborhoods in the Fall to share information and strengthen communication (Dave Cavanaugh and Tom Fulton)

8. Submit nominations, including Elizabeth Douglas, Sgt. Young, etc., for the Ben Brenman Award (Dave Cavanaugh)

9. Pursue the proposed Save America’s Treasures Grant with Congressman Moran and the City Manager (Debbie Weatherly & Susan Cumbey)

10. Seek funds to provide the opportunity for Adrienne Washington to serve as a community liaison and researcher with the families that are related to people buried in Fort Ward Park (All)

11. Participate in the June 2, 2009 memorial event for Clara Adams (Glenn Eugster & Adrienne Washington)

12. Develop a proposal for a 2009 Fort Ward Family Reunion (All)



Monday, October 17, 2011

Innovations in death. Washington Post


6.

Ideas@Innovations : Innovations in death

...Burying or cremating your loved ones -- no longer your only options....
2011-08-31 - Emi Kolawole, The Washington Po

Budget Comments 2011, Alexandria, VA. by J. Glenn Eugster.


Glenn Eugster (user 91) - Comments by Date

Thanks for the opportunity to provide you with comments on the 2011 budget for the City of Alexandria. Let me begin by saying that as a homeowner and former public servant I appreciate the effort that each of you put into managing our city. Over time I’ve been struck by how difficult, complicated and seemingly thankless your work is. Whether it is an elected or government position, public service does require a different mindset and perspective. Each of you should know that many of us are grateful for what you do, and what you try to do.

With that said, my comments only reflect my small window on budget management within the city. I’ve lived in the city for over 21 years and have served on the board of two homeowners associations, the Open Space Steering Committee, and the Northern VA Conservation Trust. Although my background is fairly broad-based my focus for many years has been parks, open space, outdoor recreation, fundraising and revenue generation. It is in these areas that I will offer some suggestions that might help you as you prepare and approve our budget.

First, everyone needs to know that governments like ours never have enough money. Although taxes, grants, fees, and other sources of money are considerable there is never enough money to do everything that needs to be done, when it needs to be done. By virtue of these limits some things are more important than others. I hope that you will continue to support the basic health and safety services the city provides. I also hope that you will refrain from funding new initiatives but rather put money toward protecting and maintaining things that we have now.

Second, perhaps as much as you need to cut services to meet your budget you also need to improve the management of your existing departments. Wasting money is probably worse than not having all the funds we need to do what needs to be done.

Over the last two years I’ve been encouraged by your managers to carry park, open space, health and safety problems to each of you. Over and over again city employees are reluctant to work with community interests on anything other than what they want to do. They often use a lack of time and, or money, as their rationale for saying no, dismissing ideas shared with them, or steering citizens toward you to solve problems. Unfortunately I have found that some of the city’s agendas do not reflect community needs and interests, and these ideas have not been vetted publicly. A good number of these ideas are frankly wrong-headed and without concern for the public that these individuals are paid to serve.

Many of these bad decisions have resulted in projects and work that needs to be redone, and sometimes redone again, because of a lack of permits, poor or no planning, or a disregard for the interest of the public. On some occasions past Recreation Department directors have almost bragged about how more than 120 of the city’s parks don’t have plans and that in order to do a plan they needs lots of money. Such a perspective makes it hard for me to understand how current and future funds for these areas can ever be invested wisely.

For example, the lack of up-to-date master plan for Fort Ward Park has cost the city funds that could have been better used protecting important historic resources and providing important recreation services. Park solid waste transfer stations and maintenance yards have been developed without permits and public input only to be relocated when these uses conflict with neighbors, graves, laws, and common-sense. Drainage swales and ravines have been filled with soil, mulch, and debris without regard to the consequences of altering drainage areas and the cost of restoring these areas given they were filled without permits.

As we struggle to figure out how we can protect, maintain and provide services at parks like Fort Ward I see money given annually and non-competitively to non-profit organizations to promote the protection and acquisition of more city park land. Surely the goal of open space planning is one I support but is paying a consultant from outside the city to supplement city staff an effective way to achieve this goal?

I observe other efforts, such as the promotion of very large “special events” in parks under the guise of revenue generation. Although public agencies should look at ways to save money as well as generate revenue some of the city’s revenue generation strategies, such as the ones at Fort Ward Park, have cost the city money rather than bring in new revenues. More often than not many public servants will try to pursue revenue generation without the knowledge, skills and expertise to successfully do so.

I’ve observed problems with maintenance in our parks, such as Chinquapin Park. I’ve observed that the city has been unable to maintain these areas due to budget cuts, but we have given a non-profit group a grant/ contract to sponsor invasive plant removal projects in that same area only to have the plants they have pulled remain in a pile at the entrance to the park trail for what is now six months.

Finally, the city managers, as well as some of you at times, seem to treat citizen interest and involvement in our park areas with a certain amount of resistance and on occasion contempt. Given that many of us know the demands that are placed on you and city staff we often try to give all of you some slack as you do your jobs. However, the tension that is created between some of your antagonistic city staff and the community they serve costs them and us time and money.

By driving away, or at least keeping the citizens at arms-length also costs the city funds in other ways. For example, I have repeatedly made offers to members of your Recreation Department to share my skills and experience in the areas of fundraising and revenue generation without a hint of interest or even willingness to listen. Whether it is disdain or a dismissive nature this behavior undermines a relationship that could help the city help itself to get things accomplished and save money.

In closing, please be sure that I appreciate what you do and I wish you success with the resolution of the budget. Please look to ways to eliminate wasteful spending, tap the unrealized potential of the citizenry, and bring substantive revenue sharing expertise into city government to help meet the financial challenges you face. Please do not, under any circumstances, raise our taxes to meet needs and perpetuate the waste which goes on now.

Thanks again for the chance to comment.


Glenn

Glenn Eugster
4022 Ellicott Street
Alexandria, VA 22304

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Alexandria Acquires Fort Ward by Tom Fulton. October 9, 2010




AMERICAN UNIVERSITY’S 6TH ANNUAL PUBLIC POLICY CONFERENCE
“Advancing Social Justice in Times of Crisis”
PANEL: “Views of the Same Scene: Protecting Archaeology and Heritage in Fort Ward Park.”
Friday, October 9, 2:00 – 3:15 pm, Room , Building
Paper: Alexandria Acquires Fort Ward
Tom Fulton


On January 1, 1952 the City of Alexandria expanded its boundary west from Quaker Lane to its present limit encompassing 6.475 square miles of Fairfax County, 12,000 new residents and the area that now encompasses Fort Ward Historical Park.
The City of Alexandria, a seaport community founded in 1749, currently has a city manager government and an elected mayor and City Council. All City Council members are elected at-large, unlike those in neighboring jurisdictions such as D.C., Arlington and Fairfax County.


The manner in which Alexandria addresses citizen concerns is generally through the use of citizen boards and commissions. The city management of Fort Ward Historical Park and Museum is shared between the City Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Affairs and, the not quite co-equal Office of Historic Alexandria.


Both of these city agencies have citizen commissions advising them, as do most, if not all, of the other city agencies. The City Parks Department has the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Office of Historic Alexandria has the Historic Alexandria Resources Commission. There are also other City agencies such as the Department of Transportation and Environmental Services and the city police Department whose functions naturally touch upon Fort Ward and its management.
There are also other boards and commissions such as the Alexandria Archaeological Commission, of which I am a member, which also share oversight responsibilities for Fort Ward. The goal, ostensibly is to maximize citizen input into city policy decision making.


The acquisition of the land at Fort Ward began shortly after extension of the city limits. Although the Fort had been abandoned in 1865 and much of the 44-acre property divided into increasingly smaller parcels, civic groups such as the Seminary Hill Association with Dorothy Starr and the Civil War Roundtable led by Moreau Chambers were advocating that the city of Alexandria acquire the property in order to preserve the historic value represented in the earthen fort, one of the forts constructed in the defense of Washington.


The appeal, begun in 1953-54 met a receptive city government which was rapidly expanding city services such as streets, water and sewer and parkland in the newly acquired area. In fact, Alexandria City council had set aside $25,000 of a parkland acquisition bond issue specifically for parks in the west end. The need was especially acute at Fort Ward because of its proximity to Shirley Highway which terminated at King Street and the existence of Fairlington, a World War II government housing community built in 1944.


The Alexandria City Council endorsed the spending of the $25,000 for the acquisition of Fort Ward in 1954, specifically for the purchase of approximately 20 acres then being subdivided as the “Eagle Crest Development.” But upon completing the purchase the City began to realize that it had acquired only the west face of Fort Ward, the part that had confronted the Confederates in 1861 and not the more historically significant interior or eastern side of the Fort where the living quarters and other buildings had stood.


A community of African Americans held the land on the eastern slope of Fort Ward, and many of them did not want to sell. At this point the city realized that Fort Ward could be a part of the Civil War Centennial that was rapidly approaching and decided to move ahead with the acquisition of the approximately 44 acres that make up the current park today.


City acquisition of what is the eastern portion of Fort Ward began in the 1950’s and did not end until the 1980’s, although the Park opened on Memorial Day 1964, in time for what remained of the Civil War Centennial.
Because of the pressures associated with impending development of the land at Fort Ward, and the desire to open the Park to visitors in time for the Civil War Centennial, normal processes common in public land acquisition and subsequent operation of park land were ignored or rushed in acquiring Fort Ward. As late as the 1980’s it was discovered that the city did not hold clear title to some of the small parcels within the Park.


Although the city pursued traditional techniques in trying to understand the significance of Fort Ward itself, employing a professional archaeologist, Edward Larrabee, an architect Herbert Mark and an historian William Hershey in 1961-62, a complete inventory of the Park’s other cultural and historical resources, was not conducted and has never been done. Evidence of Native American presence at Fort Ward exists but has not been examined.


Following an archeological excavation in the summer of 1961 inside the fort itself and the compilation of the military history and significance of Fort Ward, including the design of a museum along with discussions of what its contents might include, the city in 1962 began planning for the use of the larger area now encompassed by the park.


Early planning documents prepared by and for the city clearly show the existence of at least two cemeteries within the outer boundary of the park, not including the Oakland Baptist Church cemetery – which is privately owned but also lies within the external boundaries of the Park. On the west side of the Fort itself, maps and written correspondence indicate the existence of a family cemetery later identified as belonging to the Jackson family, one of the first post civil war African American families to make the land encompassing Fort Ward their home.


On the eastern side of the Park, existing gravestones outside the Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery boundary, were clearly represented on city maps. What is less clear is whether city planners of the time knew or understood that other graves perhaps marked, perhaps not, also lay scattered around the park. It is now generally believed that a total of perhaps nine burial areas exist within Fort Ward.


The existence of these marked and unmarked graves, family cemetery sites and marked graveyards offered a tantalizing clue to another history, another less often told story, that resides at Fort Ward. African American families began making Fort Ward their home as early as 1867 and managed through great obstacles to create a community known as “the Hill” that existed for over a hundred years until the city bought the property in the 1960’s. That African American community still exists in the area of Alexandria, known over time as “The Seminary,” located near where T.C. Williams High School stands today.


In an area of the Park, now separated from the rest of the Park, city planners originally envisioned an open area. However, shortly after marking the area “open,” city planners reversed direction and designated the area as “overflow parking.” On top of the “overflow parking” drawing someone has marked the word “grave” and a small rectangle. The parking lot was never built.
What did happen, however, was that the city, without, as far as is known, a required special use permit, did eventually evolve the use of this formerly designated “open space” area, into what the city began calling its arboretum. And, despite the fact that at least one grave was clearly marked with a tombstone, began to use the area as a place to store equipment and vehicles.


In 1982, Park employee Wanda Dowell let a successful effort to place the entire 44-acre park on the National Register of Historic Places. More recently, with Alexandria sharing in the budgetary shortfalls common among area jurisdictions, the city began to look closely at what revenue generating ideas its agencies might employ to mitigate the impact of a flat or even declining revenue stream. For Fort Ward, among the largest of Alexandria’s city parks, the possibility existed of significant rent increases among those groups who might be interested in renting picnic space at Fort Ward. The city allows liquor among those who rent space with the application of a permit to serve alcohol.


With the growth of population in Alexandria, combined with a growing desire by inhabitants to recreation opportunities, pressures on Fort Ward Park began to mount. Additionally the city lacked a coherent operational plan for the management of Fort Ward (as well as other large city parks). As a result, agency officials, striving to meet often conflicting goals, found they lacked clear direction in making decisions that could harm the not even well understood cultural and historical resources on the 44 acre park.


As a result of these converging forces, individuals and citizen groups in Alexandria began to speak out for the need to reexamine city priorities in the operation of the Park. In response the city led an intensive citizen involvement effort to gain insight into what citizens felt about management and use of the park. One of the primary needs as defined by citizens was the lack of and need for a master plan for the park that would help guide city managers in future operations. Citizens articulated that they wanted to be involved in city management decisions that would substantively alter park functions.


Citizens also indicated a strong desire to identify and preserve the marked and unmarked graves in the park and to better understand the story of those African American families who called Fort Ward home.


As a result of citizen action and the efforts of academics to bring the cultural history of the park but lying outside the fort walls, the city has begun an effort to identify and locate the cultural and historic resources as a necessary prerequisite for the later development of a management plan.


The Office of Historic Alexandria and the Office of the City Manager have announced plans to form commissions to advise the city as to how to proceed in better understanding the cultural jewel the city calls Fort Ward Historical Park and Museum.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Seeking to Address Injustices by Dave Cavanaugh. October 9-10, 2009.




October 9-10, 2009
Advancing Social Justice in Times of Crisis
American University’s 6th Annual
Public Anthropology Conference
Dave Cavanaugh

Question:  How can citizen activist seeking to address injustices within our community bring about the changes we desire during challenging economic and political times?

Upon completion of the presentation audience members will appreciate the history of the Fort Ward area and how it can be used to protect the existing historical park from recreational expansion and provide an opportunity to diversify the interpretation of Civil War history.  The presentation will suggest practical ideas to facilitate a more collaborative community based planning process.

Thank you. I appreciate being here and speaking to you regarding our efforts to better diversify the interpretation and educational experience of those visiting Fort Ward by including the African American contribution.

The coalition of citizens interested in protecting Fort Ward arose out of concern for the future of the park. City officials and the Recreation Department and Commission had begun taking steps that would have dramatically changed the historic character of the park. Plans were in place to convert a portion of Fort Ward Park, a park listed on the National Register of Historic Places, to a major recreation and district maintenance facility. The plan was to increase use of the park, enlarging picnic and parking areas, making it a venue for large events.

They City of Alexandria also planned to increase use of an existing maintenance yard that over time had been expanded by Recreation and Parks without any public involvement. The maintenance yard was being used to store City owned trucks, supplies, compost, gravel and other park supplies. They had converted the maintenance facility, located next to the subdivision, into a district maintenance facility for temporary storage of trash. The physical size of the maintenance had been increased by filling in an area believed to contain grave sites. The compacted soil increased water run-off into an existing African American Cemetery located within the Park boundaries, undermining grave markers and burial sites.

Efforts by adjacent property owners expressing their concerns were brushed off as a Not in My Back Yard Issue (NIMBY). There was this notion the adjacent property owners were only interested in their narrow concerns and did not fully understand the increased demand for use of City parks.

However, African American History has not been mainstreamed into the interpretation of Civil War history in Alexandria, Virginia. Little has been written regarding the population of Contrabands that flooded into the Alexandria area. Homeless, destitute, malnourished and in poor health, families built shacks (huts) and were forced to rely on humanitarian efforts of benevolent organizations and the Union Army. Their suffering and survival are part of the Civil War story.

The increased awareness and interest in the unique African American experience is beginning to attract broader community support. The planned Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture and local African American Museums that have sprouted up over the last ten are examples renewed interest. This public response is fed by a public willingness to look back at the struggle and progress made as a result of the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 70s.

While James M. McPherson and other noted Civil War writers have elaborated on the active and crucial role of African Americans played during the Civil, this awareness has not widespread outside of academic circles. Many Americans who saw the 1990 movie, Glory were surprised to find that African American, wearing Union blue uniforms fought gallantly during the Civil War.

Near the end of the War, 1865, the Federal Government, through the Freedman’s Bureau, took on the humanitarian role of helping feed, shelter and providing clothes for the freedman. Although circumstances for African American families certainly varied, many had picked up and left home. Many families were homeless, hungry, destitute having to survive under wartime and uncertain conditions. With the end of the war, government jobs and demand for labor increased and new economic relationships began to develop. Over a period of time, African Americans helped rebuild the Seminary and Episcopal High School, and later. . . on their own, being able to buy property, establish churches and provide schools for their child.

The active participation of the African American community is absolutely essential in gaining public support to protect and eventually share their history at Fort Ward. It is the history of people brought to America as slaves, the struggle for freedom, enduring that makes their story unique and compelling. History has been used to keep African Americans in their place and marginalize their contributions. The City of Alexandria appropriated land from the African American communities to build Fort Ward and T.C. Williams High School. As Adrienne Washington has reminded coalition members, “They can take our land, but not our history.”

In 2007 the dedication for a new T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, no mention was made of the colored public school dedicated 70 years earlier on the same site. Douglas Wood, a former slave whose father served and died in the Civil War, obtained community support and funding for a four room school. The former T.C. Williams High School built in the 1960s was featured in the Hollywood film, “Remember the Titans”.

Background

At the beginning of the War, Washington, D.C. was totally unprepared. Troops from New York, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island were rushed to Washington to provide limited security for the new Lincoln administration. On April 23, Virginia voted by a small margin to secede from the Union. Early the next morning, Federal troops moved across the bridges (Long Bridge, the Aqueduct Bridge in Georgetown, and Chain Bridge) and by steamer to Alexandria to secure the highlands overlooking the District of Columbia and the City of Alexandria. Work began immediately to build forts near the bridges and secure the rail lines and major crossroads.

Fort Ward is one of 68 enclosed forts that eventually circled the nation’s capital during the Civil War. The Fort was located 3 miles northwest of Alexandria was to guard the approaches to Alexandria via routes from the West, Leesburg Pike (Route 7) and overlooked Bailey’s and Balls Cross Roads with a view of the rebel forces at Munson’s Hill. Other nearby Forts included Fort Worth, Fort Williams. After the Battle of 1st Manassas, and the increasing numbers of sick and wounded soldiers, the Theological Seminary was converted to a General Hospital with 925 beds. This is one of many hospitals in Alexandria and Washington serving the growing numbers of sick and wounded where African Americans worked.

The so called “contraband” and later “freedman” settled at the Fort and nearby areas near the Theological Seminary after the Civil War. Later families were able to buy property, build modest homes and started churches, schools and a fraternal lodge.

Telling the Civil War story today arouses strong passions and feelings even after nearly 150 years. This is no less true today in Alexandria Virginia when debating the “occupation” of Alexandria by Union forces, calling Confederate soldiers “rebels” or idolizing Robert E. Lee can begin a passionate debate.

Only somewhat reluctantly historians begin to describe the important role the City of Alexandria played as a major Union Army supply depot, transportation center, hospital center and destination for thousands of former slaves seeking refuge. The War was a tragic event that restored the Union and abolished slavery.

Slave families moved in-mass to the safety of Union lines to achieve long sought freedom. On foot and by wagon they moved down dirt roads, crossed streams into Washington, D.C., Alexandria and the outlying areas seeking refuge, food, and work. They helped build the forts, worked at the hospitals, and served as teamsters, cooks, laundresses, dock workers, ambulance drivers. During the War as many as 185,000 “contraband” enlisted as U.S. Colored Troops and fought and served as Union troops. The so called “contraband” and later “freedman” settled at the Fort and nearby areas near the Theological Seminary after the Civil War. Later families were able to buy property, build modest homes and started churches, schools and a fraternal lodge.

I would like to take a minute to introduce you to some of the events and people that make the history of the Fort Ward area so interesting and relevant to us today.

Cassius F. Lee, Robert E. Lee’s first cousin, lived nearby on his property called Menokin with his wife and family. On 20 April, 1861, three days after the Virginia convention adopted an ordinance of secession; Robert E. Lee resigned his military commission. Upon learning of his cousin’s decision to go south, he wrote a letter expressing his hope that he, Robert E. Lee, would be an instrument for peace. Cassius F. Lee did not move south as many of his friends did. He sought to protect his Menokin from being vandalized by Union troops. But his contentious nature raised suspicion of him being a southern sympathizer. After being arrested and jailed at the Capital Prison in the District of Columbia, he decided to move his family to the safety of Canada.

Burney McKnight, an African American (born abt 1848), is shown as living and working for Cassius F. Lee, Robert E. Lee’s first cousin, (1870 U.S. Census) as a domestic servant. Burney’s mother is Harriet Shorts. Harriet and her husband Burr Shorts paid for a land survey in 1879 and five years later receive the title for 10 acres of land at Fort Ward. Burney will later marry William Terrell and be one of the original founders of the Oakland Baptist Church. She died in 1930 and is buried in the Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery at Fort Ward.

Douglas Wood and his wife lived nearby. His father, William Wood, fled from his owner, enlisted and served as private in the U.S. Colored Troops (USCT), at Petersburg, Virginia. He became ill and was transported to L’Overture Hospital in Alexandria, where he died.

After the Civil War, Douglas was reunited with his mother, Susan, who had been taken south by her mistress during the War. Douglas, a chauffeur for a prominent banker in Alexandria, later obtained Julius Rosenwald funding for the construction of Seminary School for colored children on 2 acres of land he had sold to Fairfax County. The four room school house was located where T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria is located and was in existence until about 1950.

Julius Rosenwald was a part owner of Sears, Robuck and Company in 1895 and later served as its president from 1908 to 1922. He was a wealthy philanthropist who started a school building program in 1917 that was responsible for building over 5000 colored schools in the South. The inspiration for the idea was a result of a friendship between Booker T. Washington and Julius Rosenwald. A committee associated with the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, now Tuskegee University, oversaw the building program.

The Julius Rosenwald helped fund the Seminary School and the Kemper School in nearby Green Springs, in what is now Arlington. The program required the local black community to contribute cash and in-kind donations to match the Rosenwald grant. As a condition to obtaining the funding, the Fairfax County School Board had to build the school to certain design specifications, provide new desks and blackboards for each classroom, as well as two sanitary privies, and agree to maintain the school.

Lancelot Blackford, (born 23 Feb 1837, died 23 May 1914) was a former Confederate officer, and highly regarded headmaster at the Episcopal High School for Boys from 1870-1913. His diaries written entries written from 1873-1913 provide a interesting account of his daily activities including his duties, anxieties, discipline of the boys, social life and a glimpse of his feelings towards African Americans.

Harriet Cazenove, a widow, built a house and moved to the Seminary Hill area from Alexandria around 1856. In January 1858, her brother placed an advertisement in the Alexandria Gazette:

[W]anted to hire for present year, for Mrs. Harriet Cazenove, residing of the Hill, Theological Seminary, Fairfax County Virginia, a man and woman, slaves without incumbrance. The woman a cook or washer, the man to attend about the garden and stable.

Harriet and her son evacuated soon after Union troops marched into Alexandria. She fled initially to Chantilly where her mother lived. It is not known when she returned to her home near the Seminary.

Clare Adams , the daughter of Harriet and Burr Shorts, born in 1865. She later married Robert Adams and given three acres by her parents in 1898. Later that year she donated ¼ of acre of land to Fairfax County in 1898 for a one room school for colored students. The school was in operation until about 1925. Clare worked at the Seminary and for other families during different periods of her life. She was revered by family and friends and was one of the early founders of the Oakland Baptist Church. She is buried on land she had owned, now part of the Fort Ward Park.

James Jackson was born in Fauquier County in 1848. The 1870 U.S. Census records he was a Coachman at the Episcopal High School. On August 11, 1894, Lancelot M. Blackford writes in his diary: “Jem Jackson finished hauling coal last evening. The job was worth to him $58.75. In all 50 tons were hauled”

In February 1894 received a deed for 11.5 acres of land at Fort Ward. He died in 1923 is buried at Fort Ward, probably at the Jackson family cemetery.

What I have learned so far. I would share some thoughts I have on what I have learned working as volunteer on the Fort Ward Project.


The African American contribution is not readily acknowledged or valued. In the early 20th Century, American history text books in the South downplay slavery and its brutality. In Margaret McMillian’s book, Dangerous Games, The Uses and Abuses of History, she describes how “even black children in segregated schools were presented with a picture of the South in which slavery and racism were largely absent.”

At Fort Ward, the existence of former slaves in large numbers and their contribution is only now being recognized. What we leave out of text books is as or more important than what we leave in.

Cost and Benefits: Civic activist must be mindful of the cost, funding, and economic benefits of any proposal during tough economic times. During difficult economic times, expectation must be reduced.

In the case of Fort Ward, many of the visitors are predominately white civil war enthusiast with little knowledge of the presence of African Americans in large numbers in the area of the Fort. Fort construction, types of artillery, and a “Day in Camp” have been the traditional mainstay of Fort interpretive history. Updating the interpretation of history at the forts to include the African American experience, can help increase tourism.

African American Involvement: Social justice requires African Americans be directly involved in recording, documenting and describing their experience and contribution. The African American experience is different. For too long African Americans have not been actively sought out by city officials, staffs, contractors and academics to participate in local history projects. As a result White dominated institutions have ignored important elements of their story. This has lead to half-hearted attempts to present their history, e.g., virtual tours, self-guided tours, and podcasts.

Better Utilization of Resources: Fewer resources at the local level provide an opportunity for managers to creatively use citizens and community activist to meet time critical projects. This does not infer excluding professional historians.

Restructuring the Public Meeting Process: Managers should have faith in the public participation process. The process should be open and involve ad hoc groups to assist in making recommendations. City Department staffs should break away from City “officialdom” (you are invited to a public meeting) and instead invite organized groups to plan and conduct meetings, share in making recommendation for setting priorities and using public resources.

A park and the history of people within the major period of American history is a public shared resource. The public involvement process should be revamped to constructively engage members of the community. Citizens can provide supporting rationale for staff decisions and recommendations. Decisions should not be made unilaterally or out of an abundance of arrogance.

Set clear, definable goals. It is essential activist clearly anticipate and define their goals early on. History can motivate and inspire and it is often necessary to introduce possibilities. Providing ideas to City officials, staffs, commission members allows them to begin envisioning possibilities. In the case of Fort Ward, the goal is threefold, 1) remove the maintenance yard, 2) restore and return land to the park, 4) protect known grave sites and produce an interpretive history that attracts a more diverse visitor to the park.

The Fort Ward Project is a wonderful case study of civic activism. If you have any questions I would be happy to answer them.

Thank you

Fort Ward by Dave Cavanaugh. May 1, 2009

From: "Dave Cavanaugh"
To: "Rich Baier" , "Lance Mallamo"
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 12:28:37 PM
Subject: Fort Ward


Appreciate you taking the time to listen to our frustrations regarding management of the park and the need for a community based plan for the Historic Fort Ward Park.

A diverse group of concerned individuals and groups have rallied together in response to insensitive management of a historic resource. I understand the budget issues and the need to "pick battles." My experience as a land management official is that you do the easy things first, those that are inexpensive, easy to implement and can make a susbstantive difference. This includes removing a metal ticket booth that is not being used, basically stored on site, and an unsightly structure at the walk entrance. This is an eaaasy management call.

The primary management goal is to protect the resource and provide a safe, enjoyable outdoor experience for those using the park.

Glenn, Tom and myself have worked at the management level for land managing agencies at the Federal level. We understand the importance of multiple use and involving the diverse groups in making sound land management decisions. To encourage public involvement, it is important the stakeholders have confidence and trust in an open public participation process.

The listening part is easy. Maintaining objectivity and taking actions that respond to public concerns is harder.

I am concerned that the public involvement process is being characterized as not being sufficiently representative of the community and that the comments represent a NIMBY effort. After three meetings and numerous thoughtful comments, this is a mistaken view of the citizen participation process. We don't need a "do over."

I believe if you and your staff look at the comments, you will find they are in general reasonable and reflect the current economic conditions. They are not radical and many of the suggestions can be implemented immediately or in a reasonable short term, e.g., two years.

I would like to see City staff consolidate the comments, develop and frame outstanding issues, and provide a workable strategy for resolving the issues identified. What was missing from the earlier "community listening meetings" was the City (RPCA/OHA) promised short term-long term actions in response to the comments.

Take care and I look foward to a more substantive response at the April 13, 2009 public meeting.



Dave Cavanaugh
(703) 869-8362

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

A Solid Waste Disposal Site in Fort Ward Park by J. Glenn Eugster. March 9, 2008.


March 9, 2008
Dear Mr. Doucette,

This evening I met with some of my neighbors and they mentioned that Fort Ward Park is within what the City of Alexandria, VA. Parks & Recreation Department calls District 2. I thought that this informatioin might give you some additional background as you look into our complaint.

The park serves as a service area and solid waste transfer station for Witter Manager A, Fort Ward Park Manager B, Ben Brenman Park Manager C, and Holmes Run Manager D. Services included collecting garbage and brush from each of these parks, and the City Library, at Ft. Ward Park and then having them picked-up and transported to a solid waste disposal site.

The attached City presentation, from June 20, 2006, describes the service area of the park.

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks again for your assistance.

Glenn Eugster
4022 Ellicott Street
Alexandria, VA 22304

Fort Ward Park and CODE ENFORCEMENT

Issue: Piles of Soil have redirected water flow into our back yard
CODE ENFORCEMENT BUREAU
TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
Clearing or grading an area 2,500 square feet or more, or removal/addition of soil in excess of 18 inches, requires an approved conservation plan, an erosion control application and the posting of a bond. Before you dig, you must call Miss Utility 72 hours in advance, 1.800.552.7001. For more information on Erosion Control and The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance, please call the Department of Transportation and Environmental Services on 703.838.4324.
Issue: Dumpster needs cover and relocation away from neighbors
City Code Title 5 Transportation and Environmental Services
Chapter 1 Solid Waste Control
Sec. 5-1-2 Definitions.

(2)   Bulk waste containers.  A sturdy, water-tight, covered metal container which can only be emptied directly into a refuse truck by mechanical means. 

(13)   Solid waste.  Unwanted or discarded material in a solid or semi-liquid state, consisting of garbage, trash or a combination thereof, but excluding recyclable materials.

14)   Trash.  Solid waste materials incident to the ordinary conduct of a household, place of business or industrial establishment, including unmounted tires, but not including ashes, building materials, industrial wastes, hazardous wastes, recyclable materials or metal objects over three feet in length or weighing over 75 pounds. 

(17)   Yard debris.  Shrubbery prunings, tree prunings not over two inches in diameter, grass clippings and similar materials. (Code 1963, 32A-2; Ord. No. 3021, 3/16/85, Sec. 1; Ord. No. 3570, 5/11/92, Sec. 1; Ord. No. 3819, 9/16/95, Sec. 1) 

Sec. 5-1-12 Approved waste containers

c)   The director shall not approve any bulk waste container that is not sturdy, in good condition, made of watertight metal and tightly covered except when being filled or emptied and stored in a place that affects or offends the occupants, the general public and nearby residents as little as reasonably possible under the circumstances. In order to so protect the occupants, the general public and nearby residents, the director may require screening of the storage place as a prerequisite for approval. (Code 1963, Sec. 32A-4)

Sec. 5-1-13 Covers to be kept on waste containers.
A tight fitting cover shall at all times be kept on every waste container, except when the containers are being filled or emptied. (Code 1963, Sec. 32A-5)

. 5-1-16 Area on which waste containers located to be kept clean.
The area upon which waste containers are stored or placed for collection shall be kept clean and free of solid waste. (Code 1963, Sec. 32A-8)

ARTICLE D Solid Waste Collection Regulations

Sec. 5-1-41 Collection by city
(b)   Points of collection for approved bulk waste containers.  The point of collection shall be at a place that has been approved by the director. The director shall only approve places that affect or offend the occupants, the general public and nearby residents as little as reasonably possible under the circumstances. The director may require surfacing of the point of collection as a prerequisite for approval. It shall be the duty of the owner or operator of an establishment using an approved bulk waste container to secure the approval of the director for the point of collection. 

ARTICLE F Solid Waste Disposal

Sec. 5-1-71 Disposal sites generally.
(a)   It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a private disposal site for solid waste, ashes or yard debris in the city, unless a special use permit shall first have been obtained as specified in sections 7-6-191 through 7-6-195 of this code. It shall also be unlawful for any person to dispose of any solid waste, ashes or yard debris at any site within the city other than those sites designated by the director.

Sec. 5-1-82 Accumulation of solid waste, recyclable material, etc.
(a)   It shall be unlawful to allow, permit, or have an accumulation of ashes, solid waste, recyclable material or yard debris on any premises within the city which tends to create a public nuisance or health problem. Whenever the director or his agent finds that it reasonably appears there is immediate danger to the life, health or safety of any person due to the aforesaid accumulation on any premises within the city, then such premises are hereby declared to be a public nuisance.
(b)   When such a public nuisance is found to exist on any premises, the occupant, or the owner in the event the premises is unoccupied, shall be given written notice by the director with the request that such accumulation shall be removed within seven days of the receipt of the notice. Should the occupant, or the owner in the event the premises is unoccupied, fail to comply with the request within that time, he shall be considered in violation of this section. (Code 1963, Sec. 32A-27)

Issue: Regular mowing of area to remove weeds

Sec. 5-9-1 Definition.
The word "weeds" as used in this chapter shall be held to include grass, weeds, bushes and any other vegetation other than trees, ornamental shrubbery, flowers and garden vegetables properly tended. (Ord. No. 2698, 6/12/82, Sec. 2)

Sec. 5-9-2 Weeds on any property--public nuisance.
Weeds on any property located within the city that are in excess of 12 inches in height are found to be a danger to the public health and are hereby declared to constitute a public nuisance. (Ord. No. 2698, 6/12/82, Sec. 2)

Sec. 5-9-3 Same--duty of owner to cut.
The owners of property located within the city shall cut the weeds that are in excess of 12 inches in height on such property. The owners of property shall also cut weeds in excess of 12 inches along public sidewalks, curb lines and within tree wells which are within 12 feet of the owner's front property line. (Ord. No. 2698, 6/12/82, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 2878, 11/12/83, Sec. 1)

Sec. 5-9-4 Same--notice to owner to cut.
The director of the bureau of code enforcement or his duly authorized agent may give notice in writing to the owner of land in the city upon which there are weeds in excess of 12 inches in height that such weeds must be cut within 10 days from the receipt of the notice or the city will cut the weeds, bill the owner for the costs and collect the costs like taxes in the event of nonpayment by the owner. Mailing to the last known post office address shall constitute sufficient service upon owners who cannot befound after a reasonably diligent search or who are nonresidents. (Ord. No. 2698, 6/12/82, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 3849, 3/23/96, Sec. 2)

Sec. 5-9-5 Same--cutting by city; billing and collection of charges; unpaid bill a lien.
Whenever the owner of real property refuses, neglects or fails to cut weeds after being notified in the manner prescribed by section 5-9-4 above, the weeds may be cut by the city. The expense thereof shall be forthwith computed, and a bill for such expense shall be prepared by the department of finance and mailed to the owner at his last known post office address within a reasonable time after the cutting. In the event the city does not receive payment of the bill within 30 days after mailing, the directorof finance shall proceed to collect the expense and may do so in the same manner as city taxes are collected. Every expense with which the owner of any real property shall have been assessed and which remains unpaid shall constitute a lien against the owner's property. (Ord. No. 2698, 6/12/82, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 3849, 3/23/96, Sec. 2)

Sec. 5-9-6 Same--failure to cut weeds after receipt of notice.
An owner of real property who has received written notice in the manner prescribed by section 5-9-4 that weeds on the owner's property, or along public sidewalks or curblines and within 12 feet of the owner's front property line, are in excess of 12 inches shall cut all such weeds within the time period set out in the notice, and the failure to do so shall constitute a violation of this section. Said violation shall be a class four civil violation which shall be enforced through the levying of a civil penalty pursuant to section 1-1-11 of this code; provided, that the penalty for the first violation occurring in any six-month period shall be $100, for a second violation occurring in any six-month period the penalty shall be $250, and for each additional violation occurring in any six-month period the penalty shall be $500. (Ord. No. 2878, 11/12/83, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 3849, 3/23/96, Sec. 2)
Issue: Code specifies that park closes
Sec. 6-1-1 Public parks and playgrounds--closing hours.
(a)   It shall be unlawful for any person to go upon or remain upon the lands or premises of any public park or public playground within the city between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m., eastern standard time or daylight saving time, whichever time is in effect; except as follows:
(1)   public officials or employees in the performance of their duties.
(2)   persons participating in or witnessing events where specific permission has been given by public authorities to exceed the above-stated time limits.
(3)   persons authorized to use the City of Alexandria marina facilities while en route to boarding or disembarking from their vessels.
(b)   Notwithstanding the contrary provisions in subsection (a), the city manager may, by regulation, amend the hours of operation of any public park or public playground upon a finding that such amendment is necessary (1) to protect or promote the health, safety or welfare of the users of or neighbors to the park or playground, or (2) to promote the efficient operation of the park or playground. If any such regulation is adopted, signs indicating the hours of operation shall be posted upon the lands or premisesof the public park or playground whose hours have been amended by the manager.

Gate is needed to restrict cars during summer activities
Gate is needed because many residents cannot read the sign, particularly in the dark since sign is not illuminated
44 acres of dark land pose a risk for injury, rape, assault
Present new workload for police patrols to protect against drug traffic and other illicit activity

Issue: Rat Control (Chapter 6)
Sec. 11-6-10 Containers for garbage, etc.; use of dumps.
Within the city, all garbage or refuse consisting of waste animal or vegetable matter upon which rats may feed, and all small dead animals, shall be placed and stored until collected in approved waste containers as provided in title 5, Chapter 1 of this code. No person shall dump on any premises, land or place, public or private, any dead animals, waste vegetable or animal matter of any kind, except on official city disposal sites or other places authorized by the code official. (Code 1963, Sec. 26-10, as amended by Ord. No. 2428, 1/8/80, Sec. 3; Ord. No. 3931, 6/14/97, Sec. 1)

Sec. 11-6-11 Accumulations of garbage, etc.
It shall be unlawful for any person to place, leave, dump or permit to accumulate any garbage, rubbish or trash in any building or on any premises, improved or vacant, or on any open lot or alley in the city so that the same shall or may afford food or harborage for rats. (Code 1963, Sec. 26-11)

Sec. 11-6-12 Piles of lumber, bricks, etc.
It shall be unlawful for any person to accumulate, or to permit the accumulation of any lumber, boxes, barrels, bottles, cans, bricks, stones, containers or similar materials that may be permitted to remain on any premises, improved or vacant, or on any open lot or alley in the city, unless it shall be evenly piled or stacked on open racks that are elevated a reasonable height above the ground, but in no case less than six inches. (Code 1963, Sec. 26-12)

CHAPTER 13 Environmental Offenses

Sec. 11-13-4 Failure to keep property clean and free of accumulations of waste.
It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to keep property within the city clean and free of accumulations or deposits of waste. (Ord. No. 4211, 6/16/01, Sec. 1)