Saturday, July 9, 2011

Fort Ward Observer, December 2009, Volume 1, Issue 3 Comments


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "James Spengler"
To: "glenn eugster"
Cc: "Lance Mallamo" , "Rich Baier"
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2009 4:14:47 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fort Ward Observer, December 2009, Volume 1, Issue 3


Glenn I appreciate your interest in the park and look forward to continue to work with you. I do hope that with your professional background you realize that some of the information provided in the "Observer" is just not correct. This characterization of information seems aimed at keeping whatever community you are trying to reach upset about the park. This only adds to the tensions of various stakeholders and will lead to a less satisfactory conclusion for operation of the park. I suggest that you put your disclaimer from the end of your correspondance at the beginning.

Some specific examples:

1. Your reference to repeated contacts of city officials by various homeowners and residents is really just you in many cases.

2. The "Observer" in many parts is an editorial piece representing your sole point of view. I think you should let your readers know this and that you are presenting your opinions and not fact.

3. Your use of the term master plan is not correct. The Park Commission has the express authority by City Council to approve park master plans. This is done by official resolution and vote. Drawings, concepts, ideas may exist but the fact that they do does not make them into a master plan.

4. Your section F is all editorial. It is enough to say that previous city actions show a disregard for history. This is the case in many areas of the city and not just at Ft. Ward. As you know the street in front of the park was built on what was once part of the fort. I think current city actions are much more sensitive to our important history. Projects such as Freedmans Cemetary are possible now when a few years ago they were not. OHA has done a great job at bringing history into the forefront of many current decisions.

5. You may want to turn some of your research attention to what historical resources were destroyed or lost by the development of Marlboro Estates itself. It is conceivable that grave sites were located on your property since you are adjacent to the cemetery. Private development has probably destroyed more historical resouces that specific actions of city departments.

6. The Ad Hoc advisory group has a specific charge of work given by City Council. Most of your identified management issues are not within the charge of work.

7. Your comment about the beaver dam, stagnant water and mosquitos is way over the top. I walked the park myself and gave atttention to this area. There is no standing or stagnant water much less danger from West Nile. Your were copied on my correspondenc with Lt. Col. Lyon and know that he agreed with this assessment and suggested course of action. But you choose to still present this as an imminent danger not responded to by the city.

8. In your repeated comments about drainage in the park and the city's failure, you don't mention those homeowners from Marlboro Estates that continue to drain their roofs and yards into the park. Glenn you know that you did this with black drain pipe directly into the cemetery. If you wanted to give this subject fair treatment you would mention this outright.


Jim Spengler, Director
Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities
City of Alexandria
1108 Jefferson Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
office: (703) 746-5502
cell: (703) 258-4797
email: james.spengler@alexandriava.gov

Contraband Heritage of Self-Emancipation

On May 23, 2011 the National Trust is hosting a summit regarding the preservation of historic places associated with Contraband Heritage of Self-Emancipation. The inspiring stories of the women, children, and men who freed themselves are at the heart of American history and should be properly commemorated during the 150th anniversary of the Civil War. The leaders of the Trust believe strongly that a national effort should be undertaken to preserve, interpret, and promote Contraband Heritage sites for the benefit of future generations.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation has invited scholars, preservationists, and stakeholders to help create a collaboratively crafted vision for the preservation and interpretation of historic sites associated with Contraband Heritage.

Participants include: Adrienne Terrell Washington and J. Glenn Eugster of the Fort Ward & Seminary African American Descendants Society; Genealogist Char McCargo Bah of Stafford; Audrey Davis P. Davis of the Alexandria Black History Museum; Pamela J. Cressey, City of Alexandria, Archaeologist; Lillian Patterson of the Seminary Hill Association, Inc.; Alisa Carrell, City of Alexandria; and Lilie Finklea of Alexandria.

Together, the participants will also develop a draft set of principles and recommendations to help guide those who are working to preserve Contraband Heritage sites. It is an ambitious agenda for the day, but one which will help promote the proper stewardship of these culturally significant historic places.

The summit will be held at the historic President Lincoln’s Cottage on the grounds of the Armed Forces Retirement Home in the District of Columbia.

Oakland Baptist Church Letter to Mayor Euille on Fort Ward Park and Museum Area. March 2011.


Dear Mayor Euille:
           
            We, the members of Oakland Baptist Church, are writing you in full support of the recommendations provided by the Ft Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholders Advisory Committee as it relates to improved management of the Ft. Ward Park.  We applaud the efforts of the committee as we are aware of the complexities that had to exist in agreeing to a plan that would both address the needs of the Park while fully considering the impact on the community that immediately surrounds it; we believe that the committee’s recommendations do just that.  Additionally we are interested in scheduling a work session with you, Council members, community, and other interested individuals that could take place on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 from 5:30-7:00, or at your earliest convenient time.

            Oakland Baptist Church was founded in 1891 and has been an integral part of the Ft Ward community and the City of Alexandria since 1897 when a cemetery, on land donated by one of our founding families, was established on the eastern edge of Ft. Ward Park. Not only is the cemetery the only known African-American cemetery in Fairfax County outside of downtown Alexandria, it is the final resting home for the founding and other members of Oakland Baptist Church, which since 1931 has resided at 3408 King Street, Alexandria, Va; only blocks away for Ft. Ward Park.  In the committee’s report it details the neglect of the cemetery which includes deplorable conditions such as the erosion to gravesite headstones resulting from storm water runoff.  As you can imagine we are eager to discuss ways to both remedy the current conditions as well as prevent this type of neglect from happening moving forward.

 While we know you are focused on budgetary concerns and other important city matters, know that we are extremely anxious to hear your plans with regard to the recommendations for the Park.  We feel that the committee has taken all of the correct steps and due diligence in gathering the facts as it relates the Ft. Ward Park and the condition of our cemetery and once again we are in full support of their recommendations. 

  Thank you for your attention to this matter and we anxiously await confirmation for our work session with you.
                                                                                     
                                                                                                   
     
                                                                                        Respectfully Yours,


Lena Rainey,

Vice Chair,
Oakland Baptist Church,
703 509-9186

Donald C. Hayes,
Pastor 
703 901-7522
                                                                                                
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    

Federal Funds for Fort Ward Park by Tim Aiken. November 4, 2009.


Federal Funds for Fort Ward Park: Congressman Jim Moran, Virginia Democrat and senior member of the House Appropriations Committee announced that funds for Fort Ward Park were included in the FY 2010 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill (H.R. 2996). The legislation passed on June 26, 2009. The bill provides $75,000 to preserve the Fort Ward Civil War Fort, improve access for the disabled, and update displays to include more recent historical developments in the park's history. The bill requires non-federal matching funds.


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Tim Aiken"
To: "glenn eugster"
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:38:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: Status of Save America's Treasures Money


Signed into law 10/30. T

93
State Project Amount
AL ........................ Historic Montevallo Main Hall Renovation ...................................... 150,000
AL ........................ Swayne Hall, Talladega ....................................... 490,000
CA ........................ Mission Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara .......................................... 650,000
CO ....................... Shenandoah-Dives Mill National Historic Landmark ......................................... 150,000
CT ........................ Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Preservation ...................................... 150,000
CT ........................ Sterling Opera House Renovation ........................................ 150,000
FL ........................ Freedom Tower, Miami, FL ................................................ 500,000
GA ........................ Morehouse College (King papers) ........................................... 200,000
IA ......................... Des Moines Art Center, Des Moines ............................................. 200,000
ID ......................... Historic Old Pen Site Stabilization Project ............................................ 150,000
IL ......................... Repairs to Historic Chicago Landmark ............................................ 50,000
KS ........................ Colonial Fox Theater, Pittsburg ........................................... 500,000
KY ........................ Judge Joseph Holt House Historic Restoration ......................................... 150,000
MA ....................... Hancock Shaker Village Restoration ......................................... 150,000
MA ....................... Stockbridge Mission House Renovation ........................................... 117,000
MD ....................... Harmony Hall Restoration .......................................... 100,000
MI ........................ Big Sable Lighthouse, Ludington ............................................ 100,000
MN ....................... CSPS Sokol Hall ................................................. 150,000
MN ....................... Restoration of Historic Coe Mansion .............................................. 150,000
MS ....................... Madison County Courthouse ........................................... 500,000
MS ....................... Medgar Evers site, Jackson .............................................. 250,000
MT ....................... City of Bozeman Main Street Historic District Restoration .......................................... 150,000
NC ....................... Bellamy Mansion Slave Quarters .............................................. 100,000
NJ ........................ Georgian Court Mansion Restoration ........................................... 200,000
NJ ........................ South Orange Village Hall Restoration ........................................... 150,000
NV ........................ Lincoln County Courthouse, Pioche ................................................ 200,000
NY ........................ Historic Owego Municipal Building Rehabilitation ........................................ 150,000
NY ........................ Hudson River Sloop Clearwater Restoration ........................................... 150,000
NY ........................ Richardson Olmsted Complex, Buffalo ................................................ 200,000
NY ........................ Strand Theater, Plattsburgh ............................................ 200,000
NY ........................ Tarrytown Music Hall Restoration ............................................ 150,000
NY ........................ Village Park Historic Preservation ............................................ 150,000
OR ....................... Wallowa County Courthouse, Enterprise .............................................. 200,000
PA ........................ Hatborough Union Library Restoration .............................................. 38,000
PA ........................ Saylor Cement Kilns Historic Preservation ............................................ 200,000
PR ........................ San Juan North Portal Restoration ............................................. 150,000
RI ......................... Warwick City Hall, Warwick ................................................. 350,000
SC ........................ Chesterfield Courthouse Restoration ............................................. 150,000
SC ........................ Cypress Historic Meeting Compound ................................................ 200,000
SC ........................ Modjeska Simkins Home Restoration ............................................. 150,000
SD ........................ State Theater, Sioux Falls ................................................... 200,000
TN ........................ Blount Mansion, Knoxville ............................................... 250,000
UT ........................ Historic Fisher Mansion Restoration Project ................................................. 150,000
VA ........................ Belgian Building Preservation ............................................ 150,000
VA ........................ Chesterfield County Historic Preservation ............................................ 150,000
VA ........................ Fort Ward Park Preservation ............................................. 75,000
WA ....................... Schooner Adventuress Restoration ............................................. 180,000
WI ........................ Bayfield Historic Courthouse Restoration ............................................. 150,000
WV ....................... Capitol Theater, Wheeling ................................................ 200,000
WV ....................... Claymont Court Historic Site Restoration ............................................. 150,000
WV ....................... Cottrill’s Opera House Restoration ............................................. 150,000
Total, Line Item Projects ..............................10,200,000
Bill Language.—The conference agreement includes language
which designates the amount for Save America’s Treasures and incorporates
the projects into law by reference.

Timothy B. Aiken
Legislative Director
Office of Rep. James P. Moran
2239 Rayburn Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Direct Phone Number 202 226-0015

A Tale of Two Graveyards


Seminary Civic Association
1005 N. Quaker Lane
Alexandria, VA 22302
(703)379-9511

March 30, 2010

Editor
Alexandria Gazette Packet
Alexandria, VA 22302

Dear Sir:

I recently was made aware of, and obtained a copy of, your March 25, 2010 newspaper containing an article by Michael Lee Pope, entitled, “A Tale of Two Graveyards.” The article immediately caught my attention in that it pertained to two (2) historic sites that have particular significance, relevance and impact on the African Americans of Alexandria and throughout the country. The discovery, recognition and highlighting of both the Contraband and Freedman’s and Ft Ward cemeteries is long overdue and much appreciated.

I live in, and represent the African American community in Seminary, immediately to the left of Ft Ward Park. You might well imagine our disappointment and utter dismay when there was absolutely no mention of the African Americans of our community who after the Civil War, lived, worked, and were buried on that land before it was transformed into Fort Ward Park. Additionally, there was no mention of the historic Oakland Baptist Church whose cemetery is, and has been since early 1900’s, actually located in the Park. Some of the disturbances to the gravesites by the City are to the gravesites of family members at the church and community. We fail to understand how you could write about lost graves at Ft Ward and not mention this rich history.

I wanted to call your attention to how actions taken at the Ft Ward Park directly impact the lives of those of us in this community of Seminary, express our chagrin and concern over not being mentioned, and ensure that once again we won’t “represent a lost chapter of Alexandria’s history.”
Sincerely,


Frances C. Terrell
President

Community Feedback


Community Feedback
Fort Ward Observer


January 5, 2011

To all concerned:

I write this to you after examination of the facts to date but without formal findings in-hand of the archeological study recently undertaken at Ft. Ward Park.
I offer this to you for your collective consideration based upon my best professional judgement, with the following recommendations:
* Immediate issues with maintenance yard backing to private fences should be resolved with City plantings of native conifers (alternating double row to create visual screen) with minimum 15' offset from fence/private property lines. 80 trees are needed that will grow to 30' and at least 10' girth.
* Dumpsters should not be placed within 100' of this area/limit of work/property line.
The stormwater issues are more complex, but from walking the property following heavy rainfall and snow melt over the past 20 yrs., it's clear that:
* Debris (fallen trees, siltation) must be removed above existing storm drains so that water may flow unabated.
* Future measures MUST include culverts under existing roadways and the establishment of two or more new storm drain basins near culvert and picnic area collection basins to feed to existing storm drains.
* A dedicated stormwater drain "right-of-way" is needed via a 36-inch diameter (minimum) pipe to catch the upland water from developed areas and feed the existing stormwater system at Van Dorn.
* A Federally-funded Environmental Assessment (EA) should include civil engineering data study and estimate for potential site improvements to preserve and protect Historic Ft. Ward Park.
Measures should continue to proactively protect, preserve and possibly expand cemetery / memorial areas featuring known and/or documented human remains, with approved fencing and appropriate signage for public observation/interpretation.

Respectfully,

Steven C. Doulis, AIA
Occupation: Architect / Project Manager
National Park Service/National Capital Region
Fort Ward Neighbor & Concerned Citizen
4007 Ellicott Street
Alexandria, VA 22304
email: sdoulis@comcast.net

Private William Wood

Preface:
The following case summary provides a glimpse of life during the time of slavery and the relationships that endured between freedmen and former slaveholders. It also highlights legal changes after the Civil War that needed to be changed to protect free and formerly enslaved people.


Private William Wood, Substitute Soldier, Company “D” 39th Regiment, U.S. Colored Infantry
By Dave Cavanaugh

William Wood was owned by Alex Chapman, near Salem (now Marshall), Fauquier County, Virginia. “He was described as rather slight in build and of medium height and was a field hand while a slave.” (Susan Wood Affidavit-6 May, 1878)
Shortly after 1st Manassas, William Wood fled to the Alexandria area which was under the control of Union forces. He worked as a laborer and teamster in the Arlington Heights and Alexandria areas. For periods of time he lived in Alexandria.
On 2 July 1864, William enrolled as a substitute soldier at Baltimore, Maryland in Company “D”, 39th Regiment of the U.S. Colored Troops Volunteers. He was paid to enlist as a substitute soldier for Henry Schaufiell. William was 35 years old (born 1829) and described as being 5’ 7’ with a “yellow” complexion.
In August 1864 he joined his company at Petersburg, Virginia. For three weeks he was building “breastworks in a marshy area and soon caught a severe cold” (General Affidavit, Mary Jane Lewis, William Wood’s sister, 27 July 1877). He was sent to the military hospital (September 26, 1864) at City Point and as his condition worsened, he was transported back to Alexandria and sent to the “colored” hospital, L’Overture. He died January 19, 1865 and is buried in the Alexandria National Cemetery. The record of his death and internment listed him as being married and previously living in Alexandria.

Widow’s Pension

Kitty Ann Brooks

On 3 May 1865, Kitty Ann Brooks applied for a widow’s pension claiming to be the wife of William Wood who fathered a son Robert Wood born March 31, 1863. She was about 30 years old at the time of her application.
In a sworn statement, she states they belonged to the same man (Alex Chapman) as slaves “and it was then they first lived together”. Soon after the war broke out he left Fauquier County and went to Alexandria, Virginia where he worked for the Government. She later made her way to Alexandria and they occasionally lived together but were never married”. In her statement she claims William took her to a house near the Seminary where they lived for two or three months. Conflicting accounts indicate William lived with Kitty and later they moved to a “shanty” William had built in Alexandria where they lived until William enlisted.
She learned William was at L’Overture Hospital in Alexandria and visited him before he died.

On 3 May 1865 Kitty was granted a pension of $8.00 per month. In June, 1871, she was granted an increase of $2.00 per month for support of her son Robert. Later it was discovered she was living with Charles Jones in Alexandria, Virginia and in September 1877 her pension was ended.

Susan Moore Wood

On 26th July 1877, Susan Wood, a resident of Washington, D.C., submitted a claim for widow’s pension. Born in 1824, she was now 53 years of age.
Prior to the Civil War, she worked as a slave on the Richard Rixey property not far from Salem, Virginia, present day Marshall in Fauquier County. She was Judith Rixey’s maid. Judith’s father died in 1842 and in 1850 was 19 years old, living with her brother in law Ducater B. Hall, his wife Louisa and her mother Penelope Rixey (1788-1872).

In an affidavit, George Jenkins, an illiterate enslaved black preacher recalls marrying William and Susan Wood. He (George Jenkins) “was a slave of Col. Geo. Love… and had a license to preach and perform the marriage ceremony from his said master who was clerk of the church (Baptist) at Long Branch near Salem Va. Sometime about the year 1844 and in one of the spring months, deponent (George Jenkins) joined said Wm. Wood and Susan Moore in the bonds of matrimony at the house of Mr. Richard Rixey near Salem.”

William and Susan were owned by different masters. William lived some 5 miles away from where Susan lived. Witnesses recall that William would come twice a week to see Susan, staying weekends before returning home on Monday mornings. Reportedly they had 8 children. Mrs. Louisa Hall, a daughter of Richard Rixey, provided the names and dates of birth of Susan’s four children, less than 16 years of age at the time of Williams death. Children listed include, Charlotte Wood, born July 4, 1851, Douglass Wood, born April 18, 1853, Turner Wood, born April 1, 1855 and who had recently died, and Georgiana Wood, born May 11, 1857.

In the fall of 1861, after the Battle of First Manassas there was a growing fear for the safety of woman and children. Judith Rixey took Susan, two other servants and 6 children to Athens, Georgia where they stayed for six months. They then moved to Atlanta, Georgia where they lived for one year. With Confederate losses mounting, they moved to Charleston, South Carolina for three months and to Augusta Georgia.
During the time of her trip from Athens and return to Augusta Judith Rixey left. Susan was hired out as the nurse or servant of the wife of Mr. John Ansley-who was a Quarter Master with the Confederate Army. The family split up the second year after the surrender and Susan then went to live with Mrs. Jane Wilcox, a widow and sister of Mrs. Ansley residing near Augusta Georgia.

Ms. Judith Rixey is believed to have gone to England and later moved to California. A notation on the Rixey Family Tree for Judith Rixey: “She was a great traveler.”
Susan learned that William died during the war from Decater Hall, Judith’s brother-in-law.

Susan’s claim for pension was based on statements from friends and family that she and William had been married by Pastor Jenkins and that he had fathered her children. George claimed to be a licensed preacher and recalled marrying William Wood and Susan Moore sometime during the spring of 1844. In 1878 he lived in the District of Columbia and was employed as a porter in the “25 cent store”, 7th St above H in the District of Columbia.”

During this time, Susan was living with her son Douglass Wood near the Episcopal Seminary, near Alexandria, Virginia. Her daughter in law, Matilda Wood later testified that Susan had no means of support except “which she makes by washing and ironing.”

Sworn depositions were provided by friends, family and acquaintances. The depositions were taken in 1878, thirteen years after the Civil War. As a consequence, the memory of dates and the sequence of events are unclear and at times contradictory.

Former slaves testified they were acquainted with William and Susan Wood and they were considered man and wife.

Helen Beale a slave belonging to Alex Chapman testified she belonged to Alex Chapman and knew William Wood and Kitty Brooks. “It was well known…that said William had a wife named Susan Moore, who was a slave of the Rixey family near Salem, Va.”
Fannie Steward, William Wood’s cousin, testified she knew William and Kitty Ann Brooks while they lived at the Chapman plantation. Fannie went to Alexandria to help Kitty care for their child, Robert. She believed they lived as husband and wife before his enlistment.

Mrs. Annie King, a slave of Mrs. Richard Rixey and daughter of George Jenkins, knew Susan Wood to be the wife of William Wood “who was a slave of Mr. Chapman, near White Plains, Va.” In her statement she recalls “William was a drinking man…and kept company with two woman who belonged to Mr. Chapman; these two woman were named Kitty Ann Brooks and “Muity Ann” …both these woman were very dark and that they both called said William Woods “cousin William”, they both were considered lewd women and neither were known as his wife.”

Mrs. Catherine Johnson, the mother of William Wood and now 70 years old, testified to the marriage of her son to Susan Moore and that she attended the wedding at “Richard Rixey’s place.” She knew Kitty Ann Brooks, a slave of Mr. Chapman, but did not know she had lived with William and “had a child by him.”

Eliza T. Morehead and Louisa Hall, daughters of Richard Rixey the former slaveholder also provide information as to the marriage and the names and ages of children born to Susan who would have been 16 years of age at the time of William’s death. At the end of the war, widows were paid an extra $2.00 a month until the child reached the age of 16 or the widow remarried.

In 1878, Susan’s claim for a widow’s pension was denied. The Special Agent’s report found the “marriage laws of Virginia did not contemplate or include Negroes, not even free Negroes.” At the time William joined the army Susan was away and they were not living as man and wife. Instead, the evidence showed that William was living with Kitty Brooks in Alexandria and they had a child. Co-habitation at the time of enlistment was sufficient to show that William and Kitty were living as man and wife.

The law was changed with the act of February 27, 1866. The new law recognized that colored people living together as man and wife prior to the passage of the act would be considered to be married and their children deemed legitimate.
Susan Wood would later appeal the decision. In August 1891 her claim was rejected again.

Years Later

In 1933, Georgia C. Smith, 215 W. 138th St, New York City wrote a letter to the Veterans Administration, Pension Service claiming to be William Wood’s youngest daughter and asking if the government “can do a little something for his only child living”. She identifies herself as Georgia, born in 1857 and the daughter of William Wood, “that no one in the family received any pension as a result of William’s death and that she has a picture in uncle sam’s uniform with gun and on picket.”

The letter in reply from the Director of Pensions dated April 17, 1933 states:
“The claim of Susan Wood, who appears to have been your mother, was rejected August, 1891 on the ground that she was not the legal widow of the soldier. The soldier’s legal widow, Kitty A Wood, was pensioned until her remarriage when her name was dropped from the rolls in 1878.”

Summation

The time of slavery is hard to imagine. It is anathema to our moral sensibilities that 3.5 million African Americans were enslaved prior to the Civil War. But the people who lived during that period were able to survive a war, the economic devastation and the impacts on free and formerly enslaved families. They maintained contacts and relationships that helped support each other. Although efforts to obtain a pension failed, the case demonstrates a collective effort on the part of family and friends to seek justice and assist Susan Wood in obtaining financial support as the wife of William Wood.

Fort Ward History Work Group Meeting


Fort Ward History Work Group Meeting
May 1, 2010
DRAFT MEETING SUMMARY
Prepared by J. Glenn Eugster

Attendees: Audrey Davis, Susan Cumbey, Lance Mallamo, Chris Morley, Chuck Ziegler, Elaine Tamanini, Glenn Eugster, Adrienne Washington, Dave Cavanaugh, Wally Owen

The meeting began with a continuation of the discussion of the various interests that had been expressed at the last meeting and in correspondence to OHA. Earlier a number of work group members expressed concern about the African American cell-phone tour and the way it was being developed by the city. Members suggested that the effort would be more useful if time and money was invested in a museum exhibit on African Americans at Fort Ward and Seminary.

Susan Cumbey commented that one challenge for a museum exhibit is how to deal with limited space. She noted that a large scale display was meant to be an outdoor diorama. There are 200 years of African American history in Alexandria.

Susan noted that the Museum staff had prepared a U.S. Colored Troops brochure using a NEH grant and it is on the city‘s website as well as in the Museum. She added that the website has good African American information and that she wants to revise the site to integrate African American history. There is a “Special Topics” on the web-page for the brochure.

Adrienne Washington said that no one should have to drill to find this information. She urged the OHA staff make the African American information more incorporated and more inclusive in the website. She added that she hoped that the panel in the main level of the Museum would be upgraded.

Adrienne mentioned that the Seminary Civic Association is creating a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization called the Fort Ward and Seminary African-American Descendants Group. She noted that six branches of the original families who lived on the land that is now Fort Ward Park continue to live within the community. The group wants to have the history of the park show that African-Americans participated in their own freedom.

Adrienne noted that what is lost in existing historical materials is recognition of the Contraband Act and that people were coming to the Fort and living in a nether land. They contributed labor, fought in the Civil War, and assisted at the Seminary. Their contribution was critical to helping the Union win the war. People were here as salves. They were working. Three people fought in the war. They participated in reconstruction. And, people are still here!

Adrienne stressed that “We can show living history”. We need to connect the two histories and honor our ancestors. She urged OHA no to just do this on the website. “We need something permanent”.

Dave Cavanaugh urged the group not to get caught in the interpretation trap. He said that we could do a number of things. It’s important to get something done, get something started. Over time we will see something clearer.

Adrienne noted the example of the Freedman’s story at the proposed memorial and added that people weren’t passive. She urged the group to bring Tracey from the Freedman’s effort to speak with this group.

Wally Owen noted that where the Freedman’s story ends at the Memorial it picks-up here at Fort Ward. Perhaps we can jump from Freedman’s to the U.S. Colored troops. He asked the group, “How can I tell the African-American and the Fort Ward Park story together? We have fragments of information”.

Susan added that the story lines could be easily incorporated into the revised Fort Ward park exhibit. Wally noted that the staff from the Smithsonian Institution urged the Museum staff to think differently and consider the concept of the forts being bastions of freedom.

Adrienne mentioned that the Fort Ward Civil War interests could hold a joint meeting with the African-American Descendants Group. She noted that this area could be a “money-maker” if the site is put on the Southern Freedom Trail.

Dave Cavanaugh asked, “Does the City value our [work group] views?” He feels that we are often told what we need to know rather than being relied on for the talent that we have. Wally replied that we need to know what the history is. Susan added that the Museum staff values the work being done and is waiting for hard-core data. She added that they have put the exhibit revisions on hold.

Adrienne said that she would like to have an exhibit on the U.S. Colored Troops put up as soon as possible. She hoped that the city would change the exhibit from a “lily-white story”. Wally commented that the story could include African-American empowerment in building the defenses of Washington and then go to the U.S. Colored Troops. Adrienne urged Wally and Susan to do a panel on the U.S. Colored Troops as soon as possible.

Dave noted that a story on William Wood, a member of the Colored Troops, could be included. He added that Douglas Wood still lives on Quaker Lane and is an Assistant Principal of Hammond High School. Adrienne added that there are records on one of her relatives, James Montgomery Peters, and his musket is a Manassas National Historic Battlefield.

Elaine Tamanini, formerly a volunteer at the Office of Archaeology, asked the group whether any research has been done on the Battle of Malvern Hill. She noted that as a child she and others found what appeared to be Civil War bullets and Native American arrowheads around the Malvern Hill Mansion.

Dave noted that another source of information is “Wives of Different Times”. He said that the history of Bishop Johns, Cooper Dawson, and the Hoff cottage, has been told.

Wally said that the exhibit will be developed but it will initially be small. Susan added that Adrienne would be consulted in its design.

Adrienne said that this Fort Ward Park effort had initially started out with tension. Now Lance Mallamo and James Spengler seemed more willing to participate and not put people in cross-hairs.

Lance Mallamo said that, “Mistakes [at Fort Ward Park] were made in the past. Promises made by former Recreation Department Director Kirk Kincannon were not delivered on”. He added that Fort Ward Park was not in the budget. The results of the public meetings indicated that people wanted more interpretation. He added that OHA has never done a workgroup like this one before but it has been a phenomenal success.

Lance added that he doesn’t think we are ready to tell the story. He said that he would be willing to do an overall panel but we have no money. He added that the funds from the National Trust and the National Park Service can only be used for certain types of work and that money for a Museum exhibit was not available. He added that more money for archaeology was likely.
Chuck Ziegler noted that the city’s budget shortfall was likely to last five years. Susan added that there is no money for printing.

Lance told the group that he thought the History Work Group was a model for other areas.

The group’s discussion focused on possible tasks for Fort Ward Museum and Park. The tasks that were suggested and discussed include:

1. A Museum exhibit on African-Americans.
2. Interpretive signs using National Trust grant money.
3. A brochure or pamphlet with a map.
4. Itineraries for visitors.
5. Articles on African-American history.
6. Completion of the Fort Ward Historical and Cultural Inventory.

There was discussion and apparent agreement on these tasks as well as the need for a near-term and longer-term strategy. The near-term strategy would focus on low or no-cost changes and be done in tandem with the History Work Group. Longer-term changes would be driven by the Fort Ward Park Ad-Hoc Advisory Group.

The discussion continued with participants suggesting other ideas for consideration. Lance suggested a model of the park outside. Wally said that the video needs to be redone. Dave urged the group to tap expertise from Smithsonian. Lance mentioned the idea of identifying, protecting and interpreting “Witness trees” in the park. He added that there was a need to do a Historic Landscape Survey and a Natural Resource Inventory.

Following this discussion the meeting was adjourned.

Fort Ward History Work Group July 10, 2010 Meeting Summary


Fort Ward History Work Group July 10, 2010 Meeting Summary

Attendees: Lance Mallamo, Susan Cumbey, Wally Owen, Tom Fulton, Dave Cavanaugh, Elizabeth Drembus, Adrienne Washington, Neil Vaz, Chuck Ziegler, Glenn Eugster, Fran Terrell.

On July 10, 2010 the Fort Ward History Work Group met to continue their research and assistance to the Office of Historic Alexandria, the Fort Ward Park Advisory Group and the City of Alexandria.

Pam Cressey sent the group a draft agenda prior to the meeting.

Tom Fulton began the discussion by suggesting that members of the group consider ways to engage the African American community in the research. “Perhaps you could create a genealogy club to raise awareness in the Woods Place area to share information and pool resources”. He suggested that the group could meet once or twice a month to pool resources. Tom indicated that he wanted to raise awareness in the Woods Place area and have people bring information into the effort in a systematic way.

Adrienne Washington of the Fort Ward and Seminary African American Descendants Society mentioned to the group that she and a steering committee have created a non-profit organization to encourage people to share information.

Ms. Washington, who is a writer and historic researcher, handed out a paper she wrote entitled, “What Does “The Fort” and Seminary” Mean to Us?

Ms. Washington mentioned that the Society has a Facebook page and she said, “We have a lot of interest. It’s not just a few key people. We want our story told and we want to frame our story accurately. This area was a self-sufficient community that has sustained us for more than 100 years”. “We want the final say, about how this story is told, to be with us. We want ownership of our information respected and kept in tact.

Tom Fulton indicated that he is not a member of Ms. Washington’s community and it is their story.

Anyone who wants to be involved is welcome. We want to be respected as a point of first reference. Eventually we are going to tell the story”, said Ms. Washington.

Ms. Washington added, “We should have done the overview interpretive sign first and my paper is the overview. We want our story to be part of the Civil War story and how our community emulated out from this land and down the hill. Our contribution is of equal importance and we have to recognize qualitative as well as quantitative information“, said Ms. Washington.

Group members shared their thoughts about the way their work was being used, or not used, by the City and how decisions would be made by the Office of Historic Alexandria.

Dave Cavanaugh said that he feels as if he is an unpaid member of Pam Cressey’s staff. “There is not enough effort on history, it’s all on archaeology”, said Cavanaugh. He said that, “The History Work Group Members need to be intimately involved in the process and he wants them to be involved in how the city uses the information he contributes. I want to be involved in the process to develop the signs“.

Lance Mallamo indicated, “Anything that goes to Neil is draft. The information we use needs to be factual. He added, “We should show how the land changed over-time. My intent is to make this collaborative”.

Dave Cavanaugh replied, “People have not been involved”.

Lance Mallamo noted that, “We have strict deadlines. This is a reimbursable account and he has to overspend his budget and then be reimbursed by the National Trust. The deadline for completion of the grant is July 1, 2011. The work needs to be completed 45 days prior to that date. We will prepare text for eight signs.

Adrienne Washington asked if eight signs wasn’t a steep assignment for Neil Vaz. Mr. Mallamo replied that it was doable based on a similar experience in Del Ray. We expect to rely on a fabricator to do the actual signs.

Ms. Washington said, “The last meeting was frustrating. What information is going to be used? There has been a disagreement over the process. Mr. Mallamo replied that the grant was a teaching grant. Dave Cavanaugh added, “The Work Group met and prepared a draft proposal. The draft wasn’t used and Pam Cressey made a proposal and identified tasks for the group”.

Fran Terrell mentioned that she was Neil’s contact for the first sign. Neil added, “Pam outlined the proposal with parameters and rules”.
Glenn Eugster said, “The city is used to working with contractors and the community wants a partnership”.

“We have tried to step back and we are at the place we are because of everything that has happened before. Neil Vaz has been hired [using the National Trust grant] and we have to respect that. It is going to be done one way or the other. The members of the History Workgroup will get to review the draft signs and the City is not chairing this work group. The city is not chairing this work group. I said that before“, said Mallamo.

Adrienne Washington reminded the group members that earlier she had suggested an information sharing meeting and it would be open to anyone.

Susan Cumbey the Director of the Fort Ward Museum said, “The group was started informally. Perhaps now someone should be charged by the community to lead the work group”.

In reply to Ms. Cumbey’s comments Ms. Washington suggested that Glenn Eugster serve as the Chair or the coordinator of the group. Given that some of the work group members were not at the meeting Mr. Eugster suggested that he “serve as staff to the group for the next meeting”.

The group’s discussion of the signs resumed and Wally Owen of the Museum said, “The signs are hors d'oeuvres to stimulate the public’s appetite for more information about the history of the community”. Susan Cumbey added, “Interpretive signs are a certain type of product”.

“Reasonable consensus will occur and draft’s of each sign will be shared with the group. Don’t talk about the trash cans any more, talk about history”, said Owen.

Mr. Mallamo said, “We have never had a work group. Our job is to present what is accurate. You have far outperformed what we expected. I would love to see the group take off”.

Susan Cumbey assured the group that, “The end-product that Neil Vaz produces is not the final result”.

The group agreed that the next meeting would be on August 7, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. At that time the first draft for six of the signs will be presented for review by the group.

The discussion then focused on the design of the text for the sign related to the Oakland Baptist Church and Cemetery. Ms. Washington asked about the church-state separation issue. Tom Fulton said that we need to keep church and state separate but we should be able to place the sign next to the cemetery.

Mr. Mallamo noted that he expects to be able to share a first draft of six of the signs at the next meeting. Ms. Washington wondered whether there were to be six or eight signs. Lance replied that funding will be for six. He said that his office has also received a $75,000 grant and some of these funds can be used for Civil War interpretation.

Susan Cumbey suggested that perhaps there could be some type of memorial area.

Mr. Mallamo said, “The placement of the signs is very important. There has been concern expressed already by a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission about having too many signs in the park. He encouraged the group “to bring a vision, interpretive plan back to the Fort Ward Park Advisory Group“.

Ms. Washington raised her concerns about the issue of African American families arriving after the Civil War. “The signs keep saying after--not during or before”. Lance replied, “That may be. Perhaps we can use some word-smithing”. He also noted that the areas annexation to the city and District of Columbia boundary needs to be mentioned.

Ms. Washington added, “There are excerpts of research to support African American occupation in the area. Maybe even slave quarters”. Wally Owen replied, “Noting that there were slave quarters in the park is a stretch. People, slaved and freed, lived in this area before the Civil War


Mr. Mallamo briefed the group on the status of funding for Fort Ward Park history, protection and interpretation.

Elizabeth Drembus, a historical researcher, shared information with the group about interpretation and cemetery preservation at the Drayton House in South Carolina including a brochure, a friends group, a bench funded by the Toni Morrison Society, and tours.

Tom Fulton offered to walk with the group at to look at an area in the park that he believes is the site of the Shorts’ home.

Comments for Fort Ward Park Advisory Group



Comments for Fort Ward Park Advisory Group
J. Glenn Eugster, 4022 Ellicott Street
Alexandria, VA. 22304
May 13, 2010

THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON FORT WARD PARK. I HOPE THAT THIS MEETING IS THE FIRST OF A NUMBER OF OPPORTUNITIES THAT YOUR GROUP WILL USE TO ENGAGE THE PUBLIC IN DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR CITY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS.

I LIVE NEXT TO FORT WARD PARK AND THE OAKLAND BAPTIST CHURCH CEMETERY. I’M ON THE BOARD OF THE SEMINARY HILL ASSOCIATION AND A MEMBER OF THE FRIENDS OF FORT WARD. I ALSO AUTHOR A NEWS LETTER CALLED THE FORT WARD OBSERVER.

I URGE YOU TO: 1) PLEASE BE SURE TO REVIEW THE COMMENTS SUBMITTED BY NANCY JENNINGS THE PRESIDENT OF THE SEMINARY HILL ASSOCIATION (SHA). OUR BOARD WAS ONE OF THE FIRST SUPPORTERS OF THE CREATION OF THE FORT WARD HISTORICAL PARK AND WE CONTINUE TO HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE PROTECTION, USE AND INTERPRETATION OF THIS AREA. (SHA COMMENTS ATTACHED)

THESE AND THE OTHER WRITTEN COMMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY RECENTLY, AND LAST YEAR, NEED TO BE ASSESSED BY YOUR GROUP. TO DATE NONE OF THE ADVISORY GROUP, OR FORT WARD HISTORY WORKGROUP MEETINGS, HAVE FOCUSED ON THIS INFORMATION.

2) THERE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN THE CITY MANAGERS, ELECTED OFFICIALS, ADJACENT HOMEOWNERS, AND THE DESCENDANTS OF PEOPLE BURIED WITHIN THE PARK AND THE OAKLAND BAPTIST CHURCH CEMETERY, ABOUT WATER PROBLEMS WITHIN THE PARK. I URGE YOU TO EXAMINE THE STORMWATER, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION PROBLEMS THAT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CHANGES THE CITY HAS MADE TO THE PARK’S MAINTENANCE AND NURSERY AREA. THESE CHANGES WERE MADE WITHOUT PERMITS AND PUBLIC REVIEW. THE CHANGES, WHICH INCLUDED COMPACTION OF THE GROUND AS WELL AS THE FILLING AND REGRADING OF DRAINAGE SWALES, HAVE CAUSED:

* EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION OF GRAVES AND GRAVESTONES IN THE OAKLAND BAPTIST CHURCH CEMETERY;
* DESECRATION OF GRAVES IN THE PARK, OUTSIDE THE CEMETERY; AND
* INCREASED EROSION, RUNOFF AND PONDING WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE PARK.

I REQUEST YOU TO LOOK AT REMEDIAL ACTIONS THAT CAN BE TAKEN BY THE CITY TO RESTORE THIS AREA TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY REGULATIONS. RATHER THAN A COSTLY STUDY OF THE ENTIRE PARK, THIS “POSTAGE STAMP REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN” CAN PROTECT IMPORTANT HISTORIC VALUES AND ADDRESS LONG-STANDING RESIDENTIAL HOMEOWNER CONCERNS.

THANKS AGAIN FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENTS.

Fort Ward Park Advisory Group Meeting

Draft Notes: Fort Ward Park Advisory Group Meeting
July 27, 2010
Prepared by J. Glenn Eugster 08-19-2010

Attendees: Tom Fulton, Rich Burne, Bill Schreiner, Phil Voorhees, James Spengler, Wally Owen, Susan Cumbey, Glenn Eugster, Carolyn Griglione, Lance Mallamo, Judy Stack, Dick Hobson, and Fran Terrell.

Tom Fulton noted that there were not enough members of the Advisory Group for this meeting to be an official meeting. Therefore no actions could be taken.

Mr. Fulton then introduced Mr. James Spengler, Director of the Alexandria Recreation Department. Mr. Spengler was requested by the Advisory Group to speak about the Recreation Department’s “Road Map for Change” which he presented to Deputy City Manager Mark Jinks in December 2009.

Mr. Spengler started by referencing the Recreation Department’s planning and construction division which he said included six people who are mostly landscape architects, who handle park planning efforts. “About 40% of their time has been going to City subdivision reviews which include defacto review of the green elements of proposed subdivisions”, said Spengler.

Mr. Spengler noted that the City Manager’s Road Map for change is aimed at focusing on what his department can do to organize their work around their core mission. “Time should go to planning“.

He added that all reviews of open space acquisition were redirected back to park planning efforts. He noted that Alexandria has a 10-year old city master plan [for recreation and parks]. “We didn’t know the exact number of parks we own until a few months ago”, said Spengler. “We own 109 properties in addition to the median strips and right-of-ways, and we are doing and inventory and infrastructure assessment of these lands as part of the CAP improvement program“.

Mr. Spengler told the group, “We need to decide on standards for specific parks--ready made drawings”. He noted that this information would be included in the Geographic Information System. “We want to get out of the system of reacting to citizen complaints”. He added that this would be a 3-year process and include baseline data and infrastructure.

Mr. Spengler said he expected to produce formal master plans for Fort Ward, Ben Breneman, and Four-Mile Run Parks. “These will be done by outside consultants and the plan for Fort Ward Park will cost approximately $60,000”. He added that Mary Stephenson, the principal planner for the Recreation Department, left and her replacement will be here in September. The new person, a native of Alexandria, has worked for the Central Park Conservancy in New York City.

“Everything built in Fort Ward Park will be mapped. There will be standards for each park. The history will require unique standards for this [Fort Ward] park”, said Spengler.

Tom Fulton asked Mr. Spengler, “How do you see the Advisory Group being folded into this work?” Spengler replied that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission will help.

“The Fort Ward Park plan was never officially approved by City Council. There have been ebbs and flows--various events and history. You don’t drop one initiative when you embrace another. What we have now is a hodge-podge of proposals and activities”, said Spengler.

Mr. Fulton asked, “What is the shelf-life of this effort? Glenn Eugster asked whether there will be specific master plan for Fort Ward Park. Without answering either question Mr. Spengler responded, “We will look at needs and demographics. The demand at the four big parks will continue to increase”.

Tom Fulton continued the meeting discussion by noting that he was pleased that four draft chapters of the Advisory Group report for the City Council have been submitted by the representatives. “I’m willing to write the missing chapters myself if they aren’t completed on schedule”, said Fulton.

“I’m giving some thought to internal discussions and have put together a time table for public review and comments. I will offer the schedule at the next meeting for review and approval”, said Fulton.

Mr. Fulton also noted that he has a list of issues and significant concerns for the group to work off of. “Why we are here needs to be addressed. Citizens need to be acknowledged“.

In response to Fulton’s comments Bill Schriener asked about how single-person concerns, such as noise from leaf blowers, should be addressed. Fulton suggested that concern be handled under park management and operations.

Alexandria resident Carolyn Griglione, a former resident of North Early Street, indicated that she was originally from Iowa which has fields and prairies. “My husband and I are concerned about Fort Ward Park’s meadows”. She noted that they were concerned about possible fires and field mice, and wanted to know how these types of problems will be handled by the city.

Ms. Griglione added, “When I come to the park I usually come by myself and I sit near the front off the [first] parking lot. I’m concerned about placing picnic tables close to the road. Could you reverse the meadow [design] and place it closer to Braddock Road and locate the picnic tables back where it is quiet and safe?”

Mr. Spengler replied, “We have to respond to the community as a whole. Fort Ward Park needs an overall plan. The primary reason for the meadows is drainage. The only inexpensive, environmentally friendly approach to managing storm water [runoff] is meadows. We are trying to slow water down. We are trying to set the meadow [design] from where the peak of the drainage area. I don’t have a personal stake in mowing or not mowing”.

Tom Fulton added, “The Parks [Recreation] Department should be commended for being willing to examine alternatives to solving problems and have the ability to look at the unintended consequences. The Advisory Group can offer some suggestions to the city. There are rats in the park. In fact, the first letter I wrote to then-Mayor Donley was about rats”.

Fran Terrell asked, Have the meadows been effective? Mr. Spengler replied, “The meadows have been effective--my observation only. I believe that residents were concerned about the number of people in the eastern picnic area and that’s why the area was closed. We have to protect historic resources and the storm water [runoff] is eroding historic artifacts”.

Lance Mallamo joined the discussion by adding that he agreed and this has been an experiment. Spengler added that “There have been only 2 or 3 formal complaints about the meadows. He added that this is part of deciding, What do you want For Ward Park to look like? Many historic battlefields are going back to restoring landscapes”.

Mallamo moved the discussion by telling the group, “There is good news! We are very close to a recommendation on the archaeological project [consultant]. There is also bad news! We are waiting for the contract office to go through new information. We are also securing permits for this job. I am meeting with James Spengler and Rich Baier and the permits will take longer. We will probably start the work in mid-September.

Mr. Mallamo went further suggesting that, “We can do a walk-around tour of the areas that will be examined as part of the [initial] archaeological work with community members on August 24, 2010 before our Advisory Group Meeting. We hope to make an announcement on the work plan and contract. We will also arrange for additional Saturday morning tours of archaeological sites. There will be gravel removal in the maintenance yard. We can develop a timeline after Thursday”.

Phil Voorhees asked about the permits. Spengler responded by saying that the biggest item is the grading plan. “Transportation & Environment will do the grading plan and it will cost $100,000”.

Fran Terrell asked, How long will this [archaeological work] take? Mr. Mallamo replied that they are looking at a two-month time frame. “Equipment will be used for certain area. Hand grading will be done in other areas.

Glenn Eugster asked if it was possible for the archaeological walking tour and community meeting to conform to the American Disabilities Act since some of the descendants of the people buried in the park are older and less mobile.

Bill Schreiner raised the issue of how the vegetation is maintained in the earthworks. “Mowing has been problematic in the past. Camp Days draw an awful lot of people. Mowing removed a chunk of the earth mound. We are not here to be a truth commission but we need to think about turf management of the entire park and this needs to be considered for the earthworks. How can we avoid slices [being taken] out of the historic embankment in the future?”

Mr. Spengler responded, “Turf wasn’t here [historically], trees weren’t here. Some of the park is hallowed ground. For a long time it was okay to park vehicles in the maintenance yard. I’m comfortable transferring historic mowing to the Office of Historic Alexandria with funding. We [Recreation Department] aren’t historic. We aren’t trained in historic maintenance and never will be. I am proposing to Lance that everything inside the ring-road will be done by the Office of Historic Alexandria”.

Spengler added, “You won’t get perfect mowing. That’s the nature of turf maintenance”.

Tom Fulton noted, “The entire park is on the National Register of Historic Places and requires an ongoing maintenance responsibility. There are four departments involved and a coordinated effort would send a positive signal that stove piping has been dissolved. It is incumbent of the two departments {Recreation and History] that the two groups work together“.

Bill Schreiner added, “Every year we have the same battle with turf management. Spengler replied, “You can’t expect 100% performance”. Susan Cumbey added, “We could get the staffs together for joint training”.

Spengler replied, “Maintenance workers don’t differentiate between different parks. We can break a contract out. I want this park to be done [maintained] totally by contract.

Tom Fulton asked about the Memorandum of Understanding that was being developed by the Recreation and Historic Departments. Mr. Spengler replied, “We are developing those documents for Schools and General Services, and Fort Ward Park comes after those agreements are completed”.

Wally Owen asked, Who mows the ball fields? It’s special equipment but couldn’t your group do the work if you had it? Mr. Spengler replied, “If we get the money we could do this. However, parks crews mostly work on athletic fields and get positive feedback from recreation groups on their work. I’m not sure there is motivation to pick-up more skills”.

Susan Cumbey noted that, Interest can be cultivated with crews--helping preserve something that has been valued”.

Mr. Spengler added that, “It would be better if it were handled by the Office of Historic Alexandria. The Recreation Department does athletic fields. This is the only historic park that they maintain”.

Fran Terrell briefed the group on the African America Interpretive signs being developed by the Office of Historic Alexandria. She noted that the Fort Ward and Seminary African American Descendants Society and the Fort Ward History Work Group are assisting Neil Vaz from Howard University who was hired by the City. Ms. Terrell noted that Mr. Vaz’s arrangement with the city has been extended until mid-September.

Ms. Terrell told the group that 6 signs were being developed and they include: an overview of Fort Ward park and the role of African Americans at the fort, Episcopal and Seminary; Founding of the Oakland Baptist Church and the creation of the cemetery; Civil War including the U.S. Colored Troops; education; six founding families living at Fort Ward prior to the creation of the park; and the Jackson Family.

Ms. Terrell also reported on a meeting held on June 28, 2010 between the Recreation Department, Office of Historic Alexandria, Oakland Baptist Church and community leaders regarding park trees that have fallen into the cemetery damaging the fence. The group discussed which park trees around the cemetery need to be removed so that damage doesn’t continue. The City Arborist looked at the trees and determined which ones were a possible hazard to the cemetery and would be removed.

Ms. Terrell noted that the group also discussed what to do with the fence [beyond repairing the tree damage] and the management of the cemetery. Lance Mallamo indicated that there has been a misunderstanding about his comments during the June 28, 2010 meeting. He wasn’t suggesting that the City of Alexandria take over the cemetery but rather that the existing chain-link fence be replaced with a more appropriate fence. He said that we could tie city interpretation to the area and open the view shed into the cemetery. “The trees were all planted after 1964. The City planted the trees along the cemetery and maintenance yard. Let’s include the cemetery as a feature of the park”.

Mr. Spengler indicated that Walter Powell is waiting for a contractor to come and repair the existing fence.

Glenn Eugster asked that the Advisory Group include discussion about the maintenance of the gravestones outside the cemetery and inside the park. He noted that there was recent damage to one of the gravestones from mowing and that others had been inadvertently damaged by maintenance activities over the last three years. Mr. Mallamo replied, “I’m not sure that this [recent] damage was due to mowing. I think it was from freeze-thaw this winter”. Mallamo added that he and his staff had wanted to remove and retrieve the damaged gravestones from the park in the past but family members expressed concern about what the city would do with them.

The meeting concluded with Tom Fulton reminding the group that the next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday August 24, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. An archaeological walking tour will be held before the meeting at 6:00 p.m.

Management at Fort Ward Park, Seminary Hill Association, Inc. April 23, 2010

SEMINARY HILL ASSOCIATION, INC.
2115 Marlboro Drive
Alexandria, VA 22304
April 23, 2010




Mr. Thomas Fulton, Chairman
Alexandria Ad Hoc Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholder Advisory Group
C/O Ms. Laura Durham, Advisory Group Staff Coordinator
Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities
1108 Jefferson Street
Alexandria, VA 22314


Re: Management at Fort Ward Park

Dear Tom,
Fort Ward Park exists today because of the efforts of Seminary Hill residents. Over 40 years ago, on April 1, 1954, the President of Seminary Hill Association (SHA) spoke to the Alexandria Planning Commission about the need to save the area as an important historical park to be used for education and enjoyment. In 2007, SHA encouraged the Alexandria City staff and the City Council to address health, crime, and quality of life issues related to Fort Ward Park and its surrounding communities. SHA appreciates the many improvements the City has made and supports continuing efforts to find solutions to ongoing problems. In addition, the SHA Board of Directors asks that one of its members become an official member of the Ad Hoc Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholder Advisory Group.
SHA appreciates the improvements since 2008 in crowd control and park uses:
An increase in the number of Recreation, Parks & Cultural Activities staff in the park on the weekends to help manage park use and noise.
The City’s improved process and better oversight on picnic area reservations and parking.
The City’s relocation of undesirable uses, in particular the maintenance yard and nursery.
SHA remains concerned about the lack of a vision for Fort Ward Park and the failure to include citizens in the Advisory Group process:
A mission and vision statement for Fort Ward Park has yet to be discussed with the community despite the Director of the Recreation Department supporting one on March 18, 2009. The City should follow through on its stated plans to update the Fort Ward Park master plan prepared in 1962 and 1978. Seminary Hill residents still lament the loss of some of the azalea bushes (by the entrance), the neglect of the remaining azaleas, and the loss of trees.
Interested citizens continue to lack a process to be included in plans for the Park; for example, a foot path parallel to the circular park-drive, a bus lane, and the relocation of the playground and dog park.
The public has no time to comment at Advisory Group meetings because the agenda is all reports from staff.
The City has held numerous public sessions and recorded comments and recommendations since 2009, but none of this information has been included in the matrix of priorities and concerns developed by the City’s groups: Department of Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities, Office of Historic Alexandria, Ad Hoc Advisory Committee, and Fort Ward History Workgroup.
Announcements of scheduled Advisory Group meetings have not reached some Seminary Hill residents. At a minimum a sign could be posted at the park entrance on West Braddock Road a few days before to alert interested residents.
Storm water continues to cause damage to parkland, residential properties in Marlboro Estates, and the graves and grave stones in the Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery.
In 1954, SHA President Wiecking appointed a standing Fort Ward Committee and told the Planning Commission that “The Association will stay with you and the City on Fort Ward, and see it through. The Association will do all it can to help make and keep Fort Ward Historical Park a benefit and credit to the City,…”. Then and now SHA members stand ready to help the City protect, manage, and enjoy this special historical park.

Cordially,
/s/
Mrs. Nancy Jennings, President
Seminary Hill Association, Inc.

Managing Fort Ward as an historic park March 10, 2009

March 10, 2009
4008 Fort Worth Avenue
Alexandria, Virginia 22304

Re: Managing Fort Ward as an historic park

To: City Elected Officials and City Manager; cc; Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities.

Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities, as the lead department, conducted community meetings with the aim of soliciting public input on the current facilities and operations at Fort Ward. What has transpired is shocking and steps must be taken to improve operations, maintenance and stewardship of the historical park.

Gradually over the last several years, the City has made changes that are inconsistent with the historic park and transformed part of it into a regional maintenance yard and transfer point for trash.  These changes have been unsightly, increased maintenance traffic and encroached into sensitive African American historic sites.  The changes have been made with complete disregard of the residents and families who live nearby and enjoy visiting the park.

Attendees at the meeting were asked to identify changes they would like to see to the park and place numbered stickers on the suggestions to help prioritize them.  Ostensibly this would allow the City to move ahead on changes they believe reflect the consensus of the participants.  Unfortunately, because of actions previously taken by Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities, there was considerable distrust and suspicion regarding their plans.

Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities have expanded the maintenance yard without a Special Use Permit, removed trees that once screened the yard from Picnic Area 1, increased the amount of composting in the Yard, paved over African-American graves, placed a large, screened dumpster in a prominent location on the circular lane, placed a a metal fabricated ticket/security booth at the entrance and installed car parking stops as speed bumps that impede walkers and discourage use by disabled patrons.  In the past they have proposed plans to increase parking areas off Braddock Road and expand picnic areas to increase use and potential revenues.

As important, Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities has made changes and continues to propose changes that alters the experience of users of the park and destroy additional African-American historic and cultural resources related to the building of the Fort and the post civil war period.

There is also an issue of not adequately managing a permit process for large crowds using the park.  There have been numerous weekends between Memorial and Labor Day when the park is overcrowded, noisy, and the use of alcohol and amplified music have been major problems.  Poor management has impacted the historic areas, grass, trees, plants, terrain, and drainage increasing City costs, at the expense of the historic character and the African-American resources.

We can have a park that allows multiple compatible uses to co-exist in an historical park.  The size, terrain, and historic character of the park limit the size of groups using the picnic facilities.  Failure to manage use of the park results in damage to the park and its historic resources disrupts quiet enjoyment of property by adjacent owners, and increases short and long term costs.

To improve management, relieve suspicion, and provide a more diverse interpretation of events at Fort Ward, I suggest the following actions be taken.

Short Term

Do nothing to increase or intensify use of the historic park. Maintain and encourage passive use of the park for tourist, history buffs, walkers, small groups of picnickers, and those who want to enjoy the natural outdoors.
Create an advisory committee with authority to help identify improvements, park management including maintenance and operation.
The City should adopt a target of removing the maintenance yard within 2-3 years.
Increase and celebrate the use of civic organizations, students and volunteers in beautifying and maintaining the park.
Involve City staff and volunteers in developing a unique interpretive history of the contribution of African Americans during the Civil War; building and maintaining the Fort, working at the nearby Fairfax Seminary Hospital, and living at the Fort after the War.
Improve the permitting process and the management of visitors during peak periods to ensure users know the park rules and pay an appropriate fee to cover administration, operation and maintenance costs associated with their use.

Long Term

Replace current car parking stops used speed bumps with ones that are more compatible for walkers and persons in wheel chairs.
Remove, the existing trash dumpster on the circular road and develop a less obtrusive container and fencing for collection of park generated trash. Offsite collection of trash for storage at the park should end.
Repaint the car parking stops to a color more compatible with a historic park, a shade of brown.
Remove the ticket/security booth and if it is necessary, install a booth that is compatible with a historic civil war park and in a location that is more effective.
Develop and implement training to ensure that operations and maintenance staff understand their responsibilities in caring for a historic park.

 
Alexandria is fortunate to have a Fort Ward. It is an important community asset entrusted to the City of Alexandria. It helps define Alexandria as a diverse community. I hope you will take steps to protect the park, its historic character and improve park management and stewardship.

Sincerely,

Dave Cavanaugh

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Traffic, Land use changes and Sexual liaisons May 9, 2011




From: "glenn eugster" To: "Seminary Hill Association" Sent: Monday, May 9, 2011 9:02:24 AMSubject: Re: Agenda for SHA meeting Thursday - traffic, land use changes and sexual liaisons
p { margin: 0; }
Nancy,

No doubt you have seen or heard that the SHA history material is back with SHA. I hope your Mothers Day was wonderful.

I've been talking with various interests adjacent to the King-Quaker-Braddock intersection. Some of the business owners aren't aware of the past planning that was done---i.e. crazy options, etc. Do you know anything further about the plans for disfunction-junction?

Also, some of the existing merchants are out of the communications loop about the Bradlee Shopping Center and the new uses that are proposed as part of the living center.

Finally, I'm still hearing concerns about the daytime sexual activities at Fort Ward Park. I've written to you, Dept. Chief Aden and some of the Parks & Recreation Commissioners but have not gotten any replies. Memorial Day and the summer will be hear soon and the park is increasingly used by children. The idea of men getting together in parked cars and in the parks western restroom for sex during the day isn't compatible with the intent of the park. I'm hoping SHA can motivate people to help the community without going to Council or the press.

All my best to you and the other board members.

Glenn

J. Glenn Eugster

Archaeological work at Fort Ward associated with Interim Drainage Project by Pam Cressey June 30, 2011


From: Pamela Cressey
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:45 PM
To: atwashin@aol.com; Audrey Davis; carleasa coates; chris morley; cziegler1@hotmail.com; dacava1@yahoo.com; drembus4@verizon.net; Frances Terrell; Francine Bromberg; Fulton-OLeary@verizon.net; glenn_eugster@comcast.net; jksander@earthlink.net; joyce sanchez; jrandle@vts.edu; Lance Mallamo; laura vetter; louis bradby; louis hicks; maddy mccoy; meg bryant brennis; Rich.Brune@verizon.net; Susan Cumbey; Wally Owen; Walter Powell
Cc: Tom Bodor; Francine Bromberg; Laura Durham; Rashad Friday; Ruth Reeder; Terilee Edwards-Hewitt (terilee@usa.net); Rose McCarthy
Subject: Archaeological work at Fort Ward associated with Interim Drainage Project



This note is to inform you that Ottery Group, the City’s archaeological consultants for Fort Ward, will be conducting an investigation of areas on the eastern side of the park to identify any significant cultural resources which could be disturbed or damaged from the first-stage drainage system. The consultants will be placing shovel-test holes along the eastern border of the park, as well as investigating trenches running east-west from this border. The intent is to protect all graves and significant cultural resources from any form of damage or disturbance during the drainage project. Heavy equipment will be in the eastern portion of the park, but there will be an archaeologist specifically assigned to work near the machinery so the soil is properly investigated and determinations made regarding grave and resource protection. We anticipate that the investigation will take about 3-4 weeks.



If significant finds are discovered, I will write when I am confident about the description/meaning of the findings. Fran Bromberg and I will be in contact with Ottery Group archaeologists and staff from the Department of Transportation and Environmental Services throughout the project.



If you have any questions, please email me.

Pam





Pamela J. Cressey Ph.D., RPA

Alexandria Archaeology

Torpedo Factory Art Center #327

Alexandria VA 22314

Office--703.746.4399

Cell—571.730.8965

Pamela.Cressey@alexandriava.gov

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Fort Ward Issues by Roger Blakeley April 1, 2008


From: "Roger Blakeley"
To: "glenn eugster"
Cc: "Kirk Kincannon" , "Steve Tompkins" , "Walter Powell" , "John Walsh" , "Laura Zabriskie Martin"
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 3:05:40 PM
Subject: FT WARD ISSUES


Glen, I wanted to let you know where we were on the issues that we addressed in February. It has taken some time to address all the issues discussed at out last meeting please share this email with your neighbors. Thanks Roger

FT Ward Maintenance Yard Concern's :

Addressing the fenced area between the homes (weeds and maintenance issues). The fence was raised so we could maintain between the owners fence line and the parks. Completed

Removing the bricks and planting material along the fence line. This was the bricks, logs and the bream of soil. Completed

Locking the gate when the crews are not at work and placing no trespassing signs at the entrance to the yard. This has been Completed

Addressing the stormwater issues by grading the City site so water flows away from the homes. After the grading was completed we also had an inspection during the last 1" rain event and the water flowed away from the homes and into the park. Completed

Cleaning and maintaining the arborist area in the park. This has been cleaned and has continued maintenance by the park crew. Completed

Addressing the screening issues (still working on this issue should be completed by next week) This issue is still being worked on and we hope to have a solution by next week. Ongoing

Cleaning the understory in fenced area behind homes. This work was done and the poison ivy has been removed. Completed

Removing two dead oaks and one cypress tree at the residents request. This work has been completed by the tree crew. Completed

Placing additional rat boxes at the site. We have contacted the pest control and have placed additional rat boxes at the site. Completed

Removing the storage pallets The storage pallets have been removed and the new ones will be stacked and removed as the contractor is able to take them off site. Completed

Stacking the mulch bags as they are delivered. The crews have and will continue to stack the bag mulch as it arrives. Completed.

Close the maintenance yard to the public. We have installed locks and lock the facility every night. Completed

Look at Commonwealth Laws. We have met with the State DEQ and reviewed the City CODE and are in compliance with the State and local laws. Complete

Over use of the park. This picnic season we have gone to a picnic reservation system only and we will regulate the amount of cars in the park and control the number of people at each picnic area. This should reduce the trash and noise and overuse of the park. Ongoing

Labor Day Weekend Complaint August 31, 2008


From: "glenn eugster"
To: "Vice Mayor Del Pepper"
Cc: "Debbie Weatherly" , "Margaret McCormack" , "Jo Ellen McCormack" , "John and Elizabeth Kling and Sullivan" , "Joanne Lepanto" , "Allen & Nancy Jennings" , "Dennis and Lynn Carroll"
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:37:00 PM


Dear Vice Mayor Pepper,

I hope this note finds you enjoying the Labor Day weekend.

The residents in Marlboro Estates need your help to address park use problems that we have been struggling with since April this year. Although the City Parks Department and the Police Department have made some effort to solve the problems that we brought to their attention, the situation with park noise and over use has continued to worsen. This situation is negatively impacting the quality of life in our community.

This evening there are somewhere between 500 and 1,000 people at an event in Fort Ward Park. There are at least three Alexandria Police cars blocking the entrance to keep more people from attending. As a result people are parking in Marlboro Estates and walking to the park.

The roads and parking areas are filled beyond capacity with cars. Cars are parked along the restricted access road to the maintenance yard and one of my neighbors saw a tour bus, parked on the lawn, inside the park. The amplified music being played exceeds the City Noise Ordinance and I believe that the car parking arrangement violates the City Fire Regulations.

I did a quick walk in the park and saw no evidence of any Alexandria Park managers present at the guard station.

Even given that it is Labor Day weekend, I think the City has lost control of the management of the park and it is having a negative impact on the Marlboro Estates neighborhood.

Would you please agree to meet with a small group of Marlboro Estate neighbors to discuss how the City uses and is managing Fort Ward Park? We would like to work with you and the City Council and managers to solve some of these ongoing problems. Feel free to call or e-mail me with information on your availability. My phone is 703-489-4207. My e-mail is: glenn_eugster@comcast.net

Thank you.

Glenn Eugster
4022 Ellicott Street

Fort Ward Park-Marlbor Estates Noise Discussions--Update July 10, 2008

From: "glenn eugster"
To: "Debbie Weatherly" , "Margaret McCormack" , "Jo Ellen McCormack" , "Robert Stoss" , "John and Elizabeth Kling and Sullivan" , "Chris & Kris Ullman" , "Chris & Kris Ullman" , "Allen & Nancy Jennings" , "Tom and Jeanne fulton-oleary" , "Dennis and Lynn Carroll" , "Thad & Susie Dilley" , "Jeff and Mary Beth Lane & Buchholtz"
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:18:46 PM
Subject: Fort Ward Park-Marlbor Estates Noise Discussions--Update


Dear Neighbors,

Since we expressed our concerns on Sunday and Monday to the City Parks & Recreation Department and the Police Department about the weekend noise levels at Fort Ward Park I have heard the following information from Capt. Hassan Aden and Walter Powell.

First, Capt. Aden spoke with the City Attorney and the noise permits that the City issues to park groups for picnic pavillions don't matter due to the City's noise ordinance. The noise permits are completely irrelevant and the Police Department can enforce the City's noise regulations. Hassan, and the City Attorney, believe that park users do have to comply with the City's noise ordinance and the Police Department will help to see that they do. Capt. Aden is continuing discussions with the City Environmental Department about possibly getting the police officers training about the noise ordinance and noise meters to measure noise levels.

Captain Aden said that once the noise ordinance discussions are completed he expects to send a memo to all of the officers in his sector so that they are aware of the rules for the park. Hassan said that he will get back to us with additional information.

Second, Walter Powell is having discussions with City officials about the use of the picnic areas and what, if any, amplified music is appropriate in those areas. Walter believes that amplified music should not be permitted in the picnic areas and should only be permitted in the park amphitheater. Walter said that there is a meeting next week within the City to discuss noise and how to address our concerns.

Both Hassan and Walter are working hard to address homeowners concerns. Your interest, calls and efforts are helping to sustain the quality of our homes, neighborhood and Fort Ward Park.

Should you have any questions please contact me.

Glenn Eugster
4022 Ellicott Street