Sunday, December 28, 2014

Search & Rescue Needed for Fort Ward’s Lost Graves


Search & Rescue Needed for Fort Ward’s Lost Graves
October 21, 2012
J. Glenn Eugster
Fort Ward Observer





In September noted historian and author C.R. Gibbs made a presentation to the members of the Fort Ward and Seminary African American Descendants Society, Inc. at the Oakland Baptist Church.  His presentation, titled “The Call of Freedom” opened with a horrific 1861 painting by Richard Ansdell called 'The Hunted Slaves’.  The painting depicts the use of dogs to find people trying to escape from slavery.  Mr. Gibbs presentation led the audience on an emotional journey through the Underground Railroad including stops in Alexandria, VA.

The people in the audience have been on another journey to research, locate and properly recognize and protect their ancestors and others who lived and are buried within the land that is now Fort Ward Historic Park.  Although City of Alexandria elected officials and government agency managers and staff have been working diligently to locate the lost graves of Fort Ward some of their work with ground-penetrating-radar and test-pits has not been able to find many of the remaining graves in the park.  

In August, in a decision that suprised descendant family members as well as those serving the city on the Fort Ward Park & Museum Advisory Group and the Fort Ward History Work Group, Lance Mallamo, Director of the Office of Historic Alexandria announced a decision to end the search for additional graves.  Although the City of Alexandria’s press release, which was shared with the media rather than community partners, offered a variety of reasons for the about face, the fact remains that there are more lost graves in Fort Ward Historic Park and community leaders want the city to continue the search.

One alternative that may be a way to compliment the city’s archaeologists, and the family members assisting them, is the use of “search and resue dogs”. Attached is a link with more information on the use of dogs to help archaeologists locate graves.  Also included is the link with information on Ansdell’s painting.


[PDF] 
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Archaeologists Can Learn From SAR Dogs. Canine SAR Background: .... •Find unmarked graves or cemeteries, including locating 'outliners' near cemeteries & ...

The Hunted Slaves' 1861 by Richard Ansdell. On display in the International Slavery Museum, Liverpool.

Comments on the Fort Ward Park Draft Drainage Master Plan: J. Glenn Eugster

Comments on the Fort Ward Park Draft Drainage Master Plan






To:  Fort Ward Park and Museum Advisory Group Members
Subject:  Comments on the Fort Ward Park Draft Drainage Master Plan
Date: May 7, 2014

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Fort Ward Park Draft Drainage Plan.  Your report is a welcome sight.  As you know water runoff from Fort Ward Park has been a long-standing problem for adjacent residents and leaders of the Oakland Baptist Church. For many years residents have contacted city staff raising their concerns with little or no response.  The fact that Fort Ward Park is managed by four separate city offices, and does not have an approved management plan, has led to many single-purpose initiatives which have been in conflict with the overall purpose of the park. 

Almost five years to the day I presented concerns on behalf of Marlboro Estates, the Seminary Hill Association, Inc. and the Oakland Baptist Church to the City’s Department of Transportation and Environmental Services (T&ES) at one of their “Stormwater Outreach Meeting” on May 13, 2009.  On January 28, 2010 a group of community leaders met with the then-Vice Mayor Kerry Donley about concerns we had related to storm water runoff from Fort Ward Park.  

Based on our discussion with Vice Mayor Donley, who worked with Rich Baier, Director of T&ES as well as former Councilwoman Alicia Hughes, we helped the city staff and Council craft a proposal, with funding support, for short-term stormwater solutions and the long-term study.  

We also worked with Council and the Office of Historic Alexandria staff to craft a proposal, with funding support, to do archaeological and cultural research to help make decisions in the short and long-term stormwater runoff master plan and proposed management plan.  With the strong support of the Mayor, City Manager and the City Council these efforts were given high priority and funded at the requested levels.

Although it is good to finally see this report, after reviewing it and discussing it with community leaders, I believe that your analysis is incomplete and the recommendations are premature and inconsistent with other facts in the public record.  The document indicates, “The challenge is to manage the stormwater runoff and to minimize flooding and erosion while preserving the historic and archaeological resources of the Park”.  Unfortunately what has been proposed will not meet the challenge. 

The report does not integrate information from written and verbal community input, the historical, cultural and archaeological research that has been done, or is now being completed.  For example, the research that City Council funded to identify graves and family burial areas within the park has not yet been completed.  The Office of Historic Alexandria recently made a belated written commitment to interview current and past city employees and descendant Fort Ward community family members to help identify where additional graves are located.  It is unclear at this time when that information will be available for review by the public and use in your decision-making. Decisions about stormwater and the overall management plan must be based on this information.

The report indicates that this effort has been designed to “Work with Local Government and Citizens to Create Viable Solutions”.  Although the consultants made presentations to the city and the Fort Ward Park and Museum Advisory Group, the efforts to engage the public to help create solutions have fallen short.  For example, there was no early communication or outreach to help create viable solutions with the homeowners from Marlboro Estates or the Oakland Baptist Church leaders despite several assurances from the Mayor, City Manager and city staff that there would be.   

The report that has been prepared is also technically flawed.  The development projects for “Site 6- The Berm” and “Site 7--Stream Stabilization” are not based on good site analysis.  For example, within the Maintenance Yard where The Berm is proposed, the document failed to recognize that the site and the soils in this area were substantially modified as a result of illegal activities by the City of Alexandria.  As you may, or may not, know this area was filled and drainage areas were modified without any permit or public notice.  The fill, which included soil, gravel and organic debris, modified the areas drainage increasing and redirecting sheet flow into the cemetery and adjacent residential properties causing flooding, erosion and subsidence.  In addition, the fill degraded and covered identified graves and family burial areas within this space.

The report also does not recognize statements made by Mr. Spengler, Director of the City of Alexandria Recreation Department, Mr. Baier and Mr. Mallamo, as well as many others, indicating that the Maintenance Yard needs to be restored to find graves as well as repair damage to drainage and vegetation.

The proposal to cover this area with more fill will not correct the damage that has been done to site drainage and will permanently cover-up graves. It ignores the need to complete archaeological and oral history research before any decisions are made.

Within the ravine, where “Site 7--Stream Stabilization” is proposed, the report failed to recognize that this ravine has been identified as an area where there are graves.  The ravine was filled with park debris as part of a Fort Ward Park Master Plan and implementation project in 1979.  At that time, Recreation Department staff, some of who still work for the city, were directed to remove gravestones and markers from parklands.  City leaders have been unwilling to discuss where those markers and stones were taken and community leaders believe that they may have been discarded in the ravine.   These points were raised with Transportation & Environmental Services and Office of Historic Alexandria leaders when Daniel Imig from T & ES brought this same stream stabilization proposal to the Advisory Group on November 11, 2010.

The proposal to further fill this area with soil and rock at this time ignores the need to complete archaeological and oral history research before any decisions are made.

The report notes, “In 2012, the City implemented interim drainage improvements on the east side of the Park to divert runoff from Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery and neighboring Marlboro Estates subdivision. The measures included installation of small catch basins, drainage pipes, and infiltration trench drains (Figure 2). The improvements provide a temporary solution to prevent runoff from flowing into the cemetery”.  This conclusion reflects poorly on your analysis in that the short-term solutions have helped reduce some stormwater runoff but did not “prevent runoff from flowing into the cemetery”.  

Perhaps this conclusion was reached after the one site reconnaissance visit that was made to the park and the cemetery.  A visit to the park and cemetery during or shortly after a rainfall illustrates time and time again that stormwater runoff continues to enter the cemetery from parklands.   This fact was repeatedly made to the advisory group members, city staff and elected officials.  The report’s analysis does not make use of photos taken during wet-weather periods by community members and provided to the city and the advisory group.

The report indicates, “Approximately 50 percent of the Park drains northeast to the Stormwater Management (SWM) Pond before entering the City’s storm drainage system at Outfall C. The SWM Pond also captures the off-site runoff from the area west of Braddock Road and the Marlboro Estate subdivision (Dedicated pond)”.  The statement is confusing and seems as if the consultants believe that there are two stormwater management ponds within the park.  The only designated stormwater management pond in Fort Ward Park is the one adjacent to Van Dorn Street.  

In summary, this report is an important element of the proposed management plan and needs to be completed.  However, the Draft Fort Ward Park Drainage Master Plan is missing crucial information on the location of graves, family burial areas and cultural artifacts.  It also fails to recognize the City of Alexandria has a moral and a legal responsibility to restore the Maintenance Yard so that damage to park drainage can be repaired and graves can be located.  Without this basic restoration and information the Site 6 and 7 alternatives presented in the draft plan are premature.  

It is essential that proposals in the drainage master plan find a way to solve stormwater runoff problems without degrading and covering-up graves, family burial areas and community history.  The city’s decision to conduct three separate studies simultaneously without integrating their sequencing, timing, information, public outreach, analysis, and recommendations has muddled the objectives of each effort and continues to delay reaching agreement on solutions to long-standing problems.  The recommendations provided in this draft will not benefit the City or the community it serves.  I urge you to place this long-term work on hold until the Maintenance Yard restoration and research on archaeology, history and culture has been completed.  

Thank you for your commitment to Fort Ward Park and the citizens it serves.

Sincerely,



Glenn

J. Glenn Eugster, Co-Chair, Fort Ward History Work Group; 
Steering Committee, Fort Ward African American Descendants Society, Inc.

cc. Rich Baier, James Spengler, J. Lance Mallamo, Mayor and City Council Members

Proposed Fort Ward Plan Holds No Guarantee--Chuck Ziegler










Proposed Fort Ward Plan Holds No Guarantee

“.... I understand that I will be making a presentation to the City Council concerning the Management Plan.  I'll be saying pretty much what I said at the joint commissions meeting, but I will lay particular emphasis on the need for a follow-on group representing the various interests in Ft. Ward Park to ensure citizen involvement in the management of the park.  We must remember that what we have produced is a plan, not legislation; there is, therefore, no guarantee going forward that any portion at all of the plan will necessarily be followed.  In this, I am not judging intentions, but rather capabilities, and citizens would be wise to monitor closely the actions of City government.  As well, the Management Plan posits a number of choices to be made (e.g., the narrative concerning historical interpretation at Ft. Ward), and citizen involvement is important there as well.”

Source:  September 30, 2014 correspondence from Charles Ziegler, Chairman,  to the members of the Ad Hoc Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholder Advisory Group


Fort Ward’s Lost Graves: Roots of Unrest CIty Departments Revert to Old Ways: J. Glenn Eugster


Fort Ward’s Lost Graves: Roots of Unrest
CIty Departments Revert to Old Ways








City of Alexandria department directors have typically done what they want to do with Fort Ward Historic Park for the last fifty years.  Civil servants often believe that they know best and they are paid to make decisions for the areas and services they provide to Alexandria residents.  For example, over the years the Recreation Department removed grave stones and markers, filled burial areas, destroyed public records and made decisions within the park without city and Commonwealth permits or public notice and input.  Many of these actions had a direct and adverse impact on historic, cultural and archaeological resources, adjacent homeowners, and the descendants of those families that lived on what is now parkland before the city’s decision to make private lands public.

Over a longer period city officials, as well as department heads, have taken, or are proposing to take, a series of actions which targeted African American communities at Fort Ward, in the Chinquapin/ Seminary area and, more recently in the Woods Lane community.  Armed with “the facts” and hiding behind the notion of the greater public good, city elected officials and department heads targeted neighborhoods for schools and athletic fields forcing people to give-up homes they had paid-off so that they had to purchase new ones at a higher price.  Other proposals calling for highway by-passes and athletic field lights within or adjacent to remaining homes creates continued uncertainty and further erodes what little trust the residents in these areas have for city leaders.   

After years of simmering problems at Fort Ward Historic Park bubbled-over when city officials, without permits, public notice or public hearings, gave their approval to place garbage dumpsters and city maintenance vehicles on top of African American burial areas and next to the Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery and the homes of Marlboro Estates.  As city leaders turned a deaf-ear toward their residents concerns the Oakland Church leaders and those from Marlboro Estates formed a loosely-knit coalition to bring more attention to the park’s problems, seek more civic engagement in city decision-making, and prepare a management plan for the park and the Fort Ward Museum.

Media stories and public input at city sponsored meetings eventually managed to turn the heads of City Council members and they took action to create a Fort Ward Park and Museum Ad-hoc Stakeholder Advisory Group to make recommendations.  The group met for nearly two years, produced a report and recommended that it be reappointed to work with the city to prepare a management plan.  City Council responded favorably and reappointed an improved version of the group and provided funds to find graves, deal with water-runoff problems and prepare a draft management plan for their review and possible approval.

For over five years the advisory group worked with city department heads and their staff, other city commissions and advisory groups, local historians, interested citizens, neighborhood and church leaders and consultants.  A major part of the discussions and planning work was aimed integrating decision-making between city department, between the city and stakeholders and between the city and the surrounding and larger community.  Considerable progress has been made as everyone involved in the process has had a chance to share their views as well as hear the views of others.  Although not directly addressed an undercurrent existed in most meetings that reflected race relations and broadening the message at the park to include civil rights with the story of the Civil War.

The latest planning effort took longer than most hoped that it would and the process of meetings, led at first by advisory groups members and later by city officials and their consultants, frustrated many government and private sector leaders.  Throughout the hundreds of meetings that went on over the course of the Fort Ward effort many people outside government felt that department heads were resistant to sharing decision-making with community interests.  Certain promises, made publicly by city department heads to work with the community and the descendant families of the Fort Ward African American community, eventually were pulled-back as the process slowly moved toward completion.

During the last meeting of the advisory group, on August 13, 2014, three members expressed their lack of trust in the City of Alexandria.  “ The draft plan doesn’t include any guarantees that graves won’t be destroyed.  I have had a problem with the process that has been going on.  We’ve been told one thing and something else has been done.  We don’t trust the city to consult with descendant families before they take action.  There have been too many instances when things were done without consulting with us.  We need to be sure that the work [to find family graves] has been done.”, said Adrienne Terrell Washington, advisory group member and President of the Fort Ward and Seminary African American Descendants Society, Inc.

In response to Adrienne’s comments, which weren’t new to the advisory group’s discussions, Sharon Annear, the group’s representative from the Seminary Hill Association, Inc. suggested that an administrative process be developed to to clarify public notice and consultations with the descendants.  She suggested that Ms. Terrell Washington and Ms. Laura Durham, the advisory group’s liaison from the Department of Recreation, develop the draft procedure. Ms. Durham suggested that “ a draft document, a best practice of how we can work together, be developed and made part of  a memo of understanding”.  The document would be attached to the memorandum.  Elisabeth Lardner, a consultant to the Recreation Department, suggested that this protocol would be part of the Memo of Understanding between city agencies with responsibilities at Fort Ward and would be made an appendix to the draft management plan.

Following some other discussions at the meeting a motion was made to approve the draft management plan, with the consultation protocol as well as other parts of the document, and forwarded on to City Council for review and possible approval.  For all practical purposes the Fort Ward Advisory Group’s work was done and it ceased to exist with the adjournment of the meeting.

The final advisory group meeting was followed by a public meeting with three other city advisory commissions on September 10, 2014.  Leaders from the Fort Ward advisory group met with those from the Park and Recreation Commission, Environmental Commission and the Historic Alexandria Resources Commission to go over the approved draft plan.  Group, commission and city department members discussed the draft plan’s Drainage and History Reports.   J. Lance Mallamo, Director of Historic Alexandria stressed that the Drainage Plan and History Report were not required to be in the management plan and there was no mandate to include them.   Striking down the idea of integration Mr. Mallamo said,  “These [reports] really aren’t relevant to the plan.
Chuck Ziegler, the last of three different members to serve as chair of the Fort Ward Advisory Group quickly countered, “We voted [to approve] the management plan with the History and Drainage Reports.

On October 6, 2014 in response to the Office of HIstoric Alexandria’s implementation of the Drainage Plan within the Old Oakland Baptist Church Graveyard,  I contacted the Fort Ward Advisory Group liaison, Laura Durham and asked her if she and Ms. Terrell-Washington had developed the consultation protocol and whether the plan had been approved by City Council.  Without a reply from the city, on November 12, 2014 I made a request to the City through the Freedom of Information Act.  Yesterday I received a  draft document, for a fee of $26.00,  dated August 2014, entitled Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Interdepartmental Memorandum of Understanding Guidelines for Ground Disturbance, including Process and Procedures to Protect Cultural Resources.  No information was provided on how this document was prepared, although Ms. Durham did not reply to my request for information and Ms. Terrell-Washington indicated she had no knowledge of the guidelines.  In addition, no information was provided on the status of the approval of the plan, although city staff and managers, as well as Council members, informally indicate that the draft plan’s proposal for an earth mound/ drainage berm on the Old Oakland Church Graveyard is now underway.  No one working on the earth mound/ berm says “If it goes in”, they say “When it goes in”.

The Fort Ward Park and Museum Draft Management Plan is voluminous and reflects considerable effort on the part of the members of the advisory group, consultants and the public.  Unfortunately actions speak louder than written words and recent efforts by the city to return to ham-fisted, paternal decisions under the cover of darkness dilutes whatever trust was built during the multi-year advisory group effort.  As in the past, it appears that city leaders still believe they know best and that they have authority to make independent decisions in Fort Ward Historic Park.  Despite thousands of hours of discussion they continue to resist sharing decision-making with the public they serve no matter what the cost to the city in terms of time and money.  Surprisingly they forget recent Fort Ward history which reveals that community interests saved the land from development and helped to support the creation of a park.  It seems that a park that tells the story of the Civil War and African Americans journey to civil rights requires an approach that is committed to government leaders and citizens working together to find ways to agree, as well as address moral and legal issues.  The best ideas for Fort Ward Park and Museum aren’t god ideas until everyone thinks they are.  Like any civil war, this is going to take awhile.

J. Glenn Eugster, 
Fort Ward Observer
November 11, 2014

Council Deferment of Presentation of the Ft. Ward Management Plan: Adrienne Terrell Washington



Council Deferment of Presentation of the Ft. Ward Management Plan





To: Chuck Zeigler, past chairman of the Ft. Ward Stakeholders Advisory Group
From: Adrienne Terrell Washington, member of FWSAG
RE: Request for CORRECTION of an email to FWSAG and Alexandria city staff on Dec. 10 erroneously stating my involvement in council deferment of presentation of the Ft. Ward Management Plan
Date: December 11, 2014

In light of your email sent to advisory group members and staffers following the City Council meeting Tuesday, Dec., 12, 2014, I am requesting that you issue an IMMEDIATE CORRECTION to RETRACT the erroneous and defamatory statements you asserted that claim that I was the sole individual responsible for the events leading up to the mayor’s and council’s rightful deferment of the presentation of the Ft. Ward Management Plan. You issued a public document that was based on what you described as “to the best of my understanding,” because you did not, as chair of the FWSAG, even talk to anyone, least of all me, who raised legitimate concerns about the Ft. Ward management plan being presented when it was discovered at the last-minute that it had been significantly altered afterit was voted on in August, as usual, without proper permission or notice by the city staff who changed, deleted or added documents (See list below).
Instead of yelling and cursing at me in the public corridors of City Hall, as well as, sending out a public communication that was stated inaccuracies about my involvement (again, without your investigation of the facts), as chair of the FWSAG, your time might have been better spent determining how, why and when the city staff had altered the Ft. Ward management plan AFTER we voted on it and AFTER we were assured repeatedly by Laura Durham that it would not be changed AFTER we voted on it.
Although I am owed a correction and as public an apology, there is a larger issue at stake as stated below. However, to set the record straight, the “distress” raised on Tuesday started well before I arrived late (after 8 pm) to the council chambers after administering a final exam at the University of the District of Columbia in downtown Washington, D.C. The ‘distress” was first raised by members of the Oakland Baptist Church, including Lena Rainey, who represents the church on the FWSAG stakeholders committee and who had also “not seen” and “not received” the altered document in question either, and subsequently showed it to me. There were members of Oakland who initiated conversations with City Manager Young and to Councilman Chapman, not I. Another fact, I joined Lena’s conversation with Chapman while it was already in progress.  By the way, Frances Terrell who represents the Seminary Civic Association, was out of town, and has since said she did not see the email that you said was sent on Friday afternoon on Dec. 5.  In any case, that timing would have given us less than one business day to read and write a response to it, which is still necessary.  As it was, it was turns what the city sent to you on Thursday, Dec. 4, and in turn to the FWSAG on Friday, was simply a long list of council hearings, etc. There was no obvious notation or indication from city staff -- as should have been extended sooner as a common courtesy --that they had taken our original document of Sept., 9, which you requested, and incorporated questionable “response(s)” in it, which significantly changed the spirit and content of our original document without our permission. It was our intent to have that document sent to the council intact to voice our concerns, again unedited by city staff.
The larger concern here is not about poor communication due to reliance on who read or saw an email at a certain time. Clearly, other members have made the same claim about missed messages. Just because an email is sent, does not mean it has been received. Also, some of us have other professional and personal obligations that do not allow us to check emails 24/7, which apparently one needs to do to keep up with city staff’s sudden and surprising actions that go against prior agreement. The larger concern that of the city staff’s practice of slipping innocuous emails on the web as a substitute for direct and transparent communication which is a much bigger and troubling long range problem. This practice has only served to exacerbate the lack of community trust in this what you aptly describe is a frustrating process, where staff continue to do what they want, when they want, how they want, continuing a longstanding tradition at Ft. Ward to act without regard or respect for residents there or for a trustworthy public process honoring community input. If you are “frustrated,” then magnify your frustration tenfold for the African American representatives on the stakeholder’s advisory committee who were repeated disrespected, dismissed or marginalized by others when we attempted to work collectively and cooperatively toward the goal of formulating a management plan that we could all live with to improve the deteriorating park but often were thwarted in our efforts. If you are “astonished,” imagine how the African American representatives feel that after all these decades and all our time volunteering to be involved in this project that nothing much has changed in this vein during the terms of either of groups establishing and negotiating guidelines for this project. In the end, the Ft. Ward management plan, written by a consultant hired by city staff, still does not address our concerns and need that continue unabated.   
These are the words that you need to correct that you sent out in an email on Dec. 10 because they are not true:  “The reasons for deferring consideration, to the best of my understanding, were the lateness of the hour (we were near the very end of the agenda), and because Ms. Adrienne Washington was distressed that she had "not seen," or "not received" the link to the docket that I had sent out on December 5, specifically Attachment 6 – 14-3417 Letter from Dissenting FWAG Members and City Response, and so the Mayor agreed to the deferment of consideration.”  Also, you do not know if I was “a recipient.” In any case as the representative of Descendants Society on the FWSAG, I never speak for myself as an individual; I speak for my constituency which I consulted on Tuesday night before agreeing with members of Oakland that we, not I, would accept the council’s offer of deferring the meeting.
Listed here are some of the items which we found troubling about what was about to be presented to the council:
Part of the disagreement Tuesday was because the City – possibly with your awareness as the then-chair of the advisory group, but not ours -- changed the content of the draft management plan from what the Advisory Group approved at their last, and then final, meeting.  Specifically the changes that were made after the group approved the plan to send to Council are:

1.  The Minority Report was expanded by the City to include its critique of the document.  The advisory group did not see, have discussions or approve the critique of the Minority Report, and it should not be a part of the draft management plan;

2.  The Fort Ward History Report was removed from the draft management plan after being approved by the advisory group for inclusion.  Lance Mallamo of the Office of Historic Alexandria suggested that the report be removed at the public hearing that was held at City Hall following the approval of the draft management plan.  You told him, however, that the advisory group approved the plan with the history report;

3.  The protocol of public notice for ground-disturbing activities was, at the suggestion of advisory group members, to be developed by Laura Durham of the Recreation Department and me.  However, I was not afforded the opportunity to see, review or help craft the protocol, as was agreed and approved by the advisory group.  It appears that the Office of Historic Alexandria developed the protocol and attached it to the draft plan without review, input, discussion and approval from the advisory group. Including a recommendation of the city in the advisory group’s plan is misleading. This document was not prepared by the group and should be either done the way we agreed or removed.

The draft plan that was submitted to City Council was not the one that the advisory group prepared and endorsed.  Just before the group took its vote to approve the plan, Laura Durham repeatedly stressed that once the group approved the plan it would not be changed before it went to City Council.  The new plan was changed and was not reviewed and approved by the advisory group.  Although you, as then-chair of the group, contend that you sent it to the group's members with four-days (actually, one business day notice) yet they were not told of the changes to the plan they approved nor were they asked for review and comment before the document was forwarded to local elected officials.  Moreover, as if it mattered, no public notice or review opportunity of these changes was provided to Alexandria's citizens.

Fort Ward’s Lost Graves: Who Knew? Who Knows?


Fort Ward’s Lost Graves:  Who Knew?  Who Knows?
Fort Ward Observer
J. Glenn Eugster
December 9, 2014




The City of Alexandria’s Council approved a process to develop a management plan for Fort Ward Historic Park in 2011.  This action was taken in response to the recommendations of an advisory group appointed by the City to look at various problems, issues and matters of concern that had been brought to their attention by residents of the City of Alexandria, VA.    The first report used input from a series of public meetings that the city held in 2009.  At that time a large number of participants indicated the need to find African American graves and burial areas within the park.  Many residents of the community that lived on the land before it became a park were buried in family graveyards.

Council took action on the initial recommendations and called for the advisory group to continue while providing three city agencies with funds to prepare a management plan and, on a short-term basis, address the search for graves as well as to better manage water running off of parkland into the adjacent Oakland Baptist Church Cemetery. 

The discussions about the unidentified graves in Fort Ward Historic Park have gone on for more than five years.  City officials have resisted most of the efforts made by the descendants of the Fort Ward community to help locate graves, family burial areas, gravestones and markers beyond those known burial areas in the park.  Comments made by city employees publicly and privately have created a dialogue that has been illusive at best and adversarial at worst.  Some of the comments that city managers and staff have made include:

The people who lived in the Fort Ward community were squatters.........

We didn’t know there were graves in the park.......

We began looking for graves in 2009 when community interest surfaced........

If there were graves they were moved........

We don’t remember where the graves were moved to..........

We didn’t think people cared about the graves......

No one remembers were the graves and grave markers were.........

The gravestones probably were discarded at the landfill.........

We couldn’t find the city correspondence related to family graves.........

City staff didn’t move the grave markers or cover grave areas........

We will remove the gravel that was placed on top of areas where graves are likely to help with the search......

We won’t remove the gravel that was placed on top of areas where graves are likely.....

We didn’t budget funds for looking for graves.........

We need factual evidence..........

Some of the descendants we interviewed are older and their memories are fuzzy..........

We have brought closure for the families of those buried in the park........

We are professionals and have done our work to the best of our abilities.......

The Oakland Baptist Church Old Grave Yard is to be managed as a sacred area........

As a result the draft management plan, which will be presented to City Council on December 9, 2014, contains little new information about unmarked graves and burial areas within the park.  Although staff of the Office of Historic Alexandria has done considerable archaeology work in and around the three known grave areas within the park--Old Oakland Baptist Church Grave Yard, Clara and Robert Adams burial area, and the Jackson Family Cemetery,  city leaders have resisted efforts to identify additional graves and burial areas.  For example, more than 1,100 test-pits were dug by city staff to search for historical artifacts while the city managers of this work admitted “we weren’t looking for graves”.

Fort Ward, the community and the historic park, is a complex place.  Although created as a historic park and designated by the City of Alexandria, Commonwealth of Virginia and the U.S Department of the Interior on to the National Register of Historic Places, many city leaders view the park as a recreation area.  Past and recent decisions at the park also reflect expressions of latent racism toward those who lived on the land, as well descendant family members.  The lack of respect for past and current city residents has grown into a deep lack of trust in city leaders.    For example, despite City Council’s commitment to “Civic Engagement” and the preparation of a draft park management plan, city leaders continue to take actions at Fort Ward without meaningful input from the community.  A history report on the Fort Ward African American Community was prepared without the input of the descendants until they complained to the Mayor.  Plans to build a earth-berm to better manage water runoff from parkland are being implemented within known and likely burial areas despite repeated concerns voiced by the descendants, Seminary Civic Association and Oakland Baptist Church leaders.

Most recently Lance Mallamo, Director of the Office of Historic Alexandria (OHA) has taken several actions which further erode trust in his office and the city in general.  For example, when the Fort Ward effort began there was considerable discussion about city staff working with descendant family members to compile information for the plan.  He continually resisted working cooperatively with the Fort Ward and Seminary African American Descendants Society, Inc., a group established for the purpose of assisting the city’s efforts at Fort Ward Historic Park.  Over time he diminished the value of conducting oral history interviews with descendant family members telling the Mayor, City Manager and others that the elderly descendants with first-hand knowledge of the park have “fuzzy memories” that couldn’t be trusted.

In September 16, 2014 Mr. Mallamo sent a written message explaining the status of his office’s efforts to interview city staff to learn more about the location of graves, family burial areas and grave markers.  Interestingly his note came over a month after the Fort Ward Park and Museum Advisory Group voted to approve the draft management plan and send it to City Council for consideration and approval, or other action.  He wrote, 

So far we’ve received approval from only one person on the city employee list for a taped interview, Wanda Dowell, former director of Fort Ward Museum, and that interview was completed in November 2013.  That tape is in the process of being transcribed and once that is done, a first draft  will be submitted to Ms. Dowell for her review and requested edits.  Once the final draft is prepared it will await a further review and approval  of the speaker before it is  posted to OHA’s website.  This is a  time consuming process, and I would not expect it to be complete until the winter months of 2015 at the earliest.  Our next interview is planned with Jean Federico though a firm date has not yet been set.

Having personally spoken to several people I recall from the list, including Ms. Dowell, Ms. Jean Federico, Ms. Susan Cumbey, Mr. Wally  Owen, Mr. Steve Tompkins, as well as myself, I can confirm that all of these persons have indicated that they have no direct knowledge or insight of graves or burial areas at Fort Ward Park, other than those still marked by a gravestone or recently surveyed by OHA”.

Mr. Mallamo’s message is troubling for a number of reasons.   First, it reflects no sense of urgency in completing research work that was to be included, and used, in the draft park management plan.  Second, it indicates that no one from the city knew, or knows, about Fort Ward’s graves and burial areas--or cares to share what they know.   Third, it contradicts factual research that was collected from public files and and interviews, provided to OHA,  which indicates that a number of past and current city employees knew, or know, of graves, grave markers and burial areas. 

Finally, despite the recommendations of Dr. Pamela Cressey,  then the City Archaeologist, OHA made no effort during the management planning period to interview other descendant family members with first-hand knowledge of these areas.  More than trying to work with people that could help the city develop a better management plan, Mr. Mallamo seemed content to avoid any information that would lead to the location of additional graves and burial areas.  In fact, city officials based their search for lost graves on those areas where graveyards had been identified by the city more than five decades ago.    

In addition to resisting collaborative input from knowledgeable African Americans Mr. Mallamo  also resisted the use of cadaver dogs and, or,  law enforcement officials, to find the bodies that remain in the park.  In some ways, after initial archaeology work done by the Ottery Group indicated that there were many more graves to be found, Mr. Mallamo, either on his own or in concert with other city leaders,  seems to have decided that he knew all that he wanted to know about burials in the park.

The draft management plan which goes to City Council on December 9, 2014 lacks information that is critical for decision-making at the park.  The question of “Who knew? and Who knows?” about Fort Ward’s lost graves remains.  Community research has revealed that many city government employees, consultants to the city, descendant family members, and others knew, or know, information about the graves.    All of these individuals, given the opportunity to share what they know about these graves, grave stones and family burial areas, can help city officials locate those who are buried in the park.  Only with this information will the draft management plan for Fort Ward be complete.   Only with this information will conflicts between burial areas and future park development be avoided.

The individuals identified through public document research and interviews include, but is not limited to, the following persons listed in Attachment A..



Attachment A.  Fort Ward’s Lost Graves:  Who Knew? Who Knows?
Fort Ward Observer
December 8, 2014

* Deceased/ Unavailable


Adams, Anthony 

Adams, Brenda

Adams, Clara *

Belk, Aprile 

Belk, Maydell Casey *

Belk, Stephanie 

Beverly, Rebecca 

Beverly, Rubin 

Blakeley, Roger 

Blankingship and Stump

Bodor, Thomas

Boothe, Armistead L. *

Boothe, Dudley and Koontz 

Bradby, Julia Adams *

Bradby, Lawrence 

Bradby, Marie 

Brown, L.

Gordon, Barbara Ashby 

Carpenter, William 

Casey, Michael 

Casey, Wesley 

Clark, Amanda 

Clark, Mr. Robert 

Coleman, Ms.LaVerne

Cook, Dayton 

Craven, Charles 

Craven, Deborah 

Craven, George * and Leona 

Craven, James W. 

Craven, Susie L. 

Craven, Walter 

Cressey, Pamela 

Crone, Octovia 

Cumbey, Susan 

Sanchez, Joyce Casey 

Daniels, Carol Ann 

DeLashmutt, Thomas N. 

Dodd, Catherine L.S. 

Dodd, Thomas F. 

Douglas, Elizabeth H. *

Dowell, Wanda 

Federico, Jean 

Franz, Karl  

Garrett, George 

Gordon, Stephanie 

Hall, P.B. 

Hall, Ralph 

Healy, John 

Heatwole, Mr. E.G. 

Henderlong, Bradford  

Smith, Dorothy Hall 

Brooks, Naomi Lewis 

Jackson, James E. 

Jackson, Robert 

Jackson, William Henry 

Javins, Samuel *

Johnson, Mr. of Washington, DC.

Johnson, Carol 

Johnson, Lucia 

Johnson, Lucien  

Johnson, Mary Crozet Wood *

Jones, Ashton C. 

King, Jean 

Knock, Patricia  

Lewis, Herman *

McKnight, Addie *

McKnight, Cassius and Rachel 

McKnight, Charles H. *

McKnight, Sealy 

Mitchell, Colonel Joseph B.  

Mitchell, Henry 

Moraski, Joseph John 

Randall, Alberta Jones 

Owen, Wally

Peabody, Leroy E.  

Peabody, City of Alexandria

Peters, Juanita *

Pippenger, Wesley E. 

Powell, Walter  

Rainey, Lena 

Randall III, Leanear 

Randall, Joseph Billy-Boy 

Randall, Lanier *

Robinson, C.C.  

Robinson, Edward M. 

Rucker, Sheila 

Ruffner, Richard and Mary 

Shackelford, Costella 

McKnight, Edmonia Smith

Simmons, Moses 

Slaymaker, C.V. 

Smith, Dorothy B. 

Smith, Joyce 

Smith, Joyce 

Smith, Wallace 

Spinner, Marie 

Sunderland, Mr. Phillip G.

Terrell, Alphonso 

Terrell, Calvin 

Terrell, Frances Colbert 

Thomas, Cornelia 

Washington, Adrienne Terrell 

Tompkins, Steve 

Young, Sgt. Lee Thomas 

Young-Smith, Judy 

Wanzer, Gerald 

Wanzer, Clifton 

Williams, Mr. V. Floyd 

Wood, Arminta W.

Wood, D. Jason